MOMZILLA!

tom-bridget-moynahan-baby.JPG

Folks were shocked and impressed when they heard that new mom Bridget Moynahan allowed ex-boyfriend Tom Brady to join her in the delivery room after she gave birth to a beautiful baby boy. But the NYDN reports that things weren’t entirely ammicable during the short visit.

“Tom was only allowed to see the baby for a short time,” says a West Coast spy. “Bridget would not see him herself.” Moynahan’s publicist said in a statement: “Bridget is very thankful for a happy baby, excited about being a mother, and very pleased that the father, Tom Brady, was able to be there for the birth.”

But our source says: “He was only allowed to come after the baby was born. The woman would not see him, period. And she gave the baby her last name.”

As for whether a reconciliation — or even another visit with his baby — is in store any time soon? “Bridget is not giving him any slack on this at all.”

In a world filled with deadbeat dads (à la Eddie Murphy), it’s sorta disappointing that a mother would deny her baby visitation from his own father. Hell truly hath no fury like a babymama scorned.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

40 Comments

  1. Maddy
    August-30-2007 @ 7:14 am

    I can understand why she’s so pissed off, but she needs to do what’s best for their son which is let him have a relationship with his father. I know I’d be furious if the man who got me pregnant wasn’t around to emotionally support me for those 9 months, but was instead running around with a super model. I’d be extremely bitter. But as a responsible parent, she shouldn’t keep them apart.

  2. only.1.without.herpes
    August-30-2007 @ 7:14 am

    Good for her .. Tom acted like a douche.. He’s really hot!!! and a great quarterback.. but the way he handled her getting pregnant.. totally classless.

  3. August-30-2007 @ 7:14 am

    Very propper. I don’t see ant wrong doing here.
    The dude jump out of the boat on hos own…so that is what he got.
    Even very generous from her, to allow him to be that close after his not very elegant ways.

  4. rk-d
    August-30-2007 @ 7:16 am

    Why should he get any slack? Sounds like she is acting like a normal person with a little pride, not a ‘momzilla’

  5. only.1.without.herpes
    August-30-2007 @ 7:16 am

    ^^she didn’t keep them apart, she just didn’t want him in there looking at her goods while pushing out a baby.. that’s a very personal time and he doesn’t deserve that.. she let him see the baby, just not her.. don’t see anything wrong with that. But, yes, she should still allow the child a relationship with the father.

  6. Maddy
    August-30-2007 @ 7:19 am

    If you think about it, she is keeping them apart. When babies are born, they spend the bulk of their time in the room with the mother or parents. If she was with the baby, he wasn’t and that must have been 99% of the time.

  7. Lucy
    August-30-2007 @ 7:21 am

    I’m not so sure Tom is the father figure you’d want around your child anyway. Just because he donated the DNA, doesn’t mean he would be a fit parent and role model. I don’t know. I guess it would really come down to whether or not I believe my child would derive any emotional benefit from being around his/her father. If Bridget knows enough about Tom that makes her think twice about having him involved then I would support that. If, however, she’s just doing it out of spite - then that’s negative for the kid, like Maddy said.

  8. yeahso?
    August-30-2007 @ 7:29 am

    it’s football season. they live on different coasts. when is he NOT going to be either practicing or flying to a city to play a game to actually bond with the child?

    plus, i think he’s a douche for having his people put out that info that she tried to trap him by getting pregnant. what the fuck ever. they were dating for like three years and just so everyone knows…there does not exist a completely fail safe birth control other than abstinence. it take two to tango.

  9. anon
    August-30-2007 @ 7:29 am

    keep in mind her hormones are out of control. if he scorned her badly, he’s the last person she wants to see. plus, maternal instincts say ‘protect my child’ even if the schmuck is the father.

  10. Barks
    August-30-2007 @ 7:30 am

    Maybe this is a little off course, but the mainstream press is treating Michael Vick like the evil incarnate but treating Tom Brady like father of the year because he took off a week to witness the birth of his baby. That is the absolute LEAST he could do. In the long run, what does more damage than a kid growing up without a father in the home? He should have sacked up as soon as he found out BM was pregnant and done the right thing instead of throwing Gisele (right?) in her face and dragging their business into the news.

  11. Anonymous
    August-30-2007 @ 7:35 am

    Barks, I agree.
    That said, she delivered a child…which is a very personal and honestly intimate situation that most people wouldn’t want to have viewed by someone w/whom there is a negative relationship.

  12. Lola Lola
    August-30-2007 @ 7:45 am

    She’s the mom. She carried the baby, made the difficult decision to have the baby alone and will, no doubt, raise the baby. She gets to call the shots. Especially when he has been such a jerk and wasnt’ around for her at all during the pregnancy. She’s hardly a ‘Momzilla’!! Why isn’t he a Jerkzilla? Barks is right. Guys get off way too easy on this front. Show up for an hour or two after all the initial hard work is done and you’re Father of the Year…ha! He’s a douche and always will be.

  13. only.1.without.herpes
    August-30-2007 @ 8:04 am

    ^^ YES Anon.. Agreed.. and Maddy, not trying to pick on you or anything but R U SERIOUS? The baby spends the most time bonding with the mother in the majority of parenting situations around the world.. the kid is not going to become developmentally challenged over it’s father not seeing it be born. And agreed with YEAH SO? he’s barely going to be around for the next six months anyway.. u think the kid is going to “suffer”, I think not.. long as mama is there and taking care. Now later on.. that’s when she will want to be more conscious of her decision to allow Brady in her life.

  14. krissa
    August-30-2007 @ 8:14 am

    only.1 - she had a c-section…
    and she gave the baby his name - John Edward Thomas Moynahan.
    His full name is Thomas Edward Brady

    I think that’s pretty generous of her…

  15. Anonymous
    August-30-2007 @ 8:22 am

    there is one thing i dont get!they were already seperated when he got a relationship with gisele and she only told tom that she was pregnant after three months!she choose the have the baby and he took his responsibilities.

  16. Minorme
    August-30-2007 @ 8:30 am

    I think this is smtg for all those pple who claimed that she got pregnant to hold on to him.She’s showing some pride here and kept the birth itself private because you are at your most vulnerable when you give birth,and why wd she want to have him ard?

  17. only.1.without.herpes
    August-30-2007 @ 8:35 am

    Didn’t know that Krissa.. but u r right.. I think she is being VERY generous given the circumstances.

  18. anon
    August-30-2007 @ 9:06 am

    She’s pissed because she deliberately got pregnant to hold onto him. No she’s angry because he simply doesn’t love her anymore and is and has always used the baby for own personal manipulative ways. She sucks. This isn’t about her. The relationship with him was over before he knew she was pregnant.

  19. Barks
    August-30-2007 @ 9:12 am

    Anon, anytime you have sex there is the possibility of getting someone pregnant. You will never convince me that a man can be “trapped.” Don’t want to have a baby then don’t have sex, that simple. If he knew the relationship was failing why did he continue to have sex with her? Why didn’t he wear a condom?

  20. Lola
    August-30-2007 @ 9:13 am

    Um, she allowed him access. What is everyone talking about?

  21. just askin'
    August-30-2007 @ 9:13 am

    anon, if their relationship was over, then he should have kept his dick zipped up, eh? Nothing like absolving the man of any responsibility. Seems to me he’s the one who sucks for trying to get one last piece of ass on the way out.

  22. NINI
    August-30-2007 @ 9:44 am

    just askin’……….you are so damn funny!That is a good point you made there!

  23. Orphan Annie
    August-30-2007 @ 9:49 am

    Good for her. Maybe someday down the road she’ll be able to let go of her hurt and anger, but it seems reasonable what she did. I’m sure he never came around during her pregnancy. He was too busy with Giselle. If he really wants a relationship with their son, he’s going to have to work for it.

  24. EAT IT
    August-30-2007 @ 10:06 am

    i wouldn’t hold anything against her. she just had a baby and the hormones are kicking.
    where was he all this time during her pregnancy? he shows up at the very end so it’s nice she even let him in the delivery room.

  25. Luella
    August-30-2007 @ 10:47 am

    She should have named him Tom, Jr. That would have really pissed that man-beast Giselle off.

  26. gblinda
    August-30-2007 @ 11:00 am

    Oh please, he’s father of the year because he showed up with flowers after the birth of his baby. He barely even acknowledged her after she was pregnant. Who cares already…

  27. Anonymous
    August-30-2007 @ 2:31 pm

    Bridget is behaving badly. Just because the man didn’t want her doesn’t mean he should be deprived of seeing his kid. What a typical bitch she is, can’t have the man so punishes him for not wanting her. People should learn that children should not be used in these silly games. The child is being punished because the father stopped loving her. Tom never gave any indication that he didn’t want the child. He just didn’t want Bridget. What was he supposed to do marry her because she was having his baby? Children don’t make bad relationships better they just prolong the enivitable. Bridget sucks big time.

  28. parissucksliterally
    August-30-2007 @ 3:41 pm

    I think Bridget is acting fine. I agree with everyone who said while she was pregnant, he was traipsing all over the world with Giselle. I DON’T believe she got pregnant to trap him.
    He looks like such an asshole to me, and this was before this whole incident.
    I don’t think he’s so great looking either.

  29. Trish
    August-30-2007 @ 4:25 pm

    If Bridget wanted to be a bitch she would have not allowed him to see the baby at all until a judge ordered a paternity test and then allowed Brady visitation.

  30. Anonymous
    August-30-2007 @ 5:37 pm

    That’s it it’s not about the baby it’s about him not wanting to be with her. You are all silly bitter women who feel that a man should probably stay with you because of a pregnancy.

  31. Anonymous
    August-30-2007 @ 5:41 pm

    Bridget is living the cliche “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”

  32. Stephi
    August-30-2007 @ 6:57 pm

    I think Bridget has handled the whole situation very well. I mean when Tom left her pregnant, he gave away a lot of his rights. I think he should definately have been allowed to be part of the birth, which he was, but I think its fair enough of Bridget to want to be left alone and to have the say concerning her child. She’s doing the right thing. He’s seemed to move on with his life now, and that’s his choice, but I’m sure he will be accepting of her wishes.

  33. shesucks
    August-30-2007 @ 7:12 pm

    This woman has manipulated this pregnancy/situation from day one! Even if she didn’t trap him, and that is a big IF, she is equally responsible for getting pregnant. They broke up in late November and had the baby in last August, exactly 9 months. Pretty obvious they did not know about the pregnancy at the time of the breakup therefore he did NOT leave a pregnant woman. His only wrong doing was falling out of love with her and into love with another woman, albiet very soon, but it does happen! Better this child is born into a broken home than be brought up in a broken home. I think he is the mature one here and has handled the situation with grace. Bridget called him out to damned Page 6 and he never denied it or said he would not take responsibility. She on the other hand used this situation to get publicity having her people alert the paps to her whereabouts. I mean, come on, since when has any tabloid publication cared about Bridget ‘b-lister’ Moynahan? The answer is never! This baby is her claim to fame and now she is using the baby to hurt her former lover because he didn’t marry her. She has acted pretty disgusting in all of this if you ask me and many other. She is not being called out as Momzilla. She is hurting this child and come off as a vindictive bitch. Tom is a good guy and had not obligation to see her during her pregnancy. I am sure we are not getting the full story because just a month ago it was reported they called and text each other often. I am sure that is all she wanted in terms of seeing him since he seems madly in love now with Gisele. She took a hit to her ego when Tom moved on so quickly. Sorry, but she is playing this wrong wrong wrong!

  34. Marion
    August-30-2007 @ 7:16 pm

    He did NOT Leave her pregnant! She had the baby 9 months after the breakup and it was widely reported that neither knew of the pregnancy at that time. This baby has a right to his Dad and since she did call him out to the public as the father, she has little to not case in Tom’s rights to see his child. She better watch it. He has alot more money and power than she does. Fact is, most people never knew her before Tom Brady or espeically the baby. It boards on her acting like a child herself ‘If I can’t have his last name, than neither can my son’! She is making a major mistake here. So sad to see someone parent like this.

  35. Brady rocks
    August-30-2007 @ 7:18 pm

    I agree! She better be careful or major court time is in her future. Tom is loved by the Kraft family and if he needs them to they can certainly interject some of their weight in making sure their QB Boy gets quality Daddy time. No one leaves Tom Brady upset or sad!

  36. babytime
    August-30-2007 @ 7:22 pm

    At first, I thought he was kinda a jerk, but now it certainly seems like she did plan this pregnancy during the final weeks to try to keep him. I mean they dated for 3 years and no accidents than all of a sudden, boom, your pregnant. I think she needs to move on and get over Tom. He is obviously in a very commited relationship with Gisele. Gisele has stuck by him through all of this. She is turning out to be a keeper! Men that do not love their ex’s are obligated to marry them, so alot of you have to get over that. He is however obligated to support his son. Not once has he denied him or said a negative comment about this situation, I now have changed my mind and really think he has been the one to take the high road.

  37. Amy
    August-30-2007 @ 7:23 pm

    I am a Pats fan and love Tom Brady. This guy, for those of you who don’t know, is a really good guy. What exactly has he done wrong her other than not marry a woman he does not love. He will prove to be a fantastic father. I am sure she will be a good Mom and this baby will be a loved happy child. Isn’t that all that matters?

  38. Georgie
    August-30-2007 @ 7:25 pm

    Exactly! He did not know she was pregnant when they broke up. Even if he did, he should not have to marry a woman he does not love. Fact is she is still bitter he moved on so quickly with Giselle Budchen. It has to kill her that he choose her over starting a family with her, but why be in a marriage that will end bady if you are not fully commited to that person? I think he did the right thing and I think she is acting very immaturely. She is taking some serious hits for her actions.

  39. sigh
    August-30-2007 @ 10:36 pm

    tom was a jerk to her no doubt, but bridget has no right to keep their child away from him for personal revenge. there is nothing to say he can’t be a good father, and he should at least be given the chance to prove himself. i hope she doesn’t continue to cut him off like this.

  40. Leanne
    August-30-2007 @ 11:29 pm

    I guess she should have kept her legs closed, til she ’sealed the deal’ as in a marriage!!!!
    Whateva, ho!!!!

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared.

Want your image to show up? Get a gravatar, it's easy.