Super hottie HEATHER GRAHAM keeps her wine coloured Imitation of Christ gown funky with nude knee-high boots at the ‘Broken’ premiere in Chicago. Meanwhile, ‘Bones’ beauty EMILY DECHANEL keeps her silk frock boho casual with simple flats at the Hot In Hollywood AIDS benefit in Los Angeles.
-
Sponsored Links


















27 Comments
both have hideous footwears
their shoes are fug! both bodies look good, but those shoes and boots suck.
Agreed. Footwear is horrendous. That aside, I’d say Heather is best. The girl is pushing 40 (she’s over 35) and she looks like the picture of youth. Great genes.
Ugghh I don’t like this dress. It’s a bit too 90s for me. I think I’ll have to go with Emily though, at least her footwear isn’t 90s as well.
Emily owns it. Heather would’ve owned it if it weren’t for the boots.
God! the boots are not good
it is not the Imitation of Christ…..I own the dress….it is from my collection called Michelle Jonas Travelwear….it’s all over my website: michellejonas.com
Heather looks hideous. The hair, the boots, everything screams nineties.
check your facts! not Imitation of Christ dress, Michelle Jonas is the name of the designer……
Emily!! I don’t like Heather.
Stephi i’m so green that you made a 90’s ref before me!
They both look fug, like they just decided that they were going to give up on bra’s and good taste at the same time.
def emily. heather’s brassy hair is all wrong, especially paired with burgundy. the 90s reference is totally on point
I beg to differ on the 90’s vibe. That dress is much more late 70’s than ’90’s. Disco vibe at its ugliest. Sorry Michelle Jonas, but that is one fug dress.
Both the boots and the sandals are hideous choices.
Yuck.
ugly ugly shoes on both!
ruins the whole thing.
Emily - I like the boho chic better, even though I’d honestly not choose either shoe.
Yeah, the dress is definately 70’s. What the youngsters don’t realize is that a lot of the fashion in the 90’s was heavily inspired by (and copies of) the fashion of the 70’s. LoL. Much the way the fashion post 2000 (of the past couple of years) has been influenced by the 80’s.
How about spelling Emily’s name right, turd? I mean, it takes like two seconds.
agree with above. what the hell, her last name’s DESCHANEL. what kind of a site do you run, lyou don’t even take a second to look up their names? wtf?
and emily owns it. both shoes suck but hers are better.
Call me old fashioned, but I have never seen a dress worn with flats that doesn’t make the wearer look frumpy. And boots are not summer wear. (Hear me, Britney?) Strappy heels are called for here, ladies.
ugh i can honestly say i don’t think either of them win here. They both look daggy.
The colour is not right for either, the footwear is hideous on both and dress itself is just plain unflattering (especially the weird length)
wtf is up with those boots
I like the dress better on Emily Dechanel but both wear ugly shoes !
The dress makes Emily’s boob look really saggy. Ugh. And yeah, I agree with the general consensus, the footwear ruins it for both women…
Emily is ROCKING that outfit!
Yeah, what’s with the bad shoes? It’s hard to focus on the dress. I give the edge to Heather.
Heather. The boots are hot.
EMILY. and wtf to the person saying the dress makes her boobs look saggy? her breasts looks perfectly normal and fine. breasts aren’t supposed to be attached to your chin.