PAM DARES TO GO BARE-FACED

fp_1949978_pamela_anderson_looks_a_quite_rough_without_makeup_in_malibu_

Wearing an ill-fitting bra, white t-shirt and short shorts, Pamela Anderson looked a bit rough as she left a Safeway in Malibu, CA yesterday (February 27).

The one time sex symbol showed off a less than sexy physique as cellulite was evident on her legs along with a strange scratch on her breast, and her choice if brassiere was doing nothing for her as it was causing bulges in unexpected places.

Not to mention, Miss Anderson was obviously not camera ready considering she wasn’t wearing a stitch of makeup and her hair was not styled to say the least!


[Fame]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

16 Comments

  1. kate wins a lot
    February-28-2009 @ 10:28 am

    Too funny, Pam is turning into Zsa Zsa Gabor right before our eyes, and it’s not pretty.

  2. Mimi
    February-28-2009 @ 10:35 am

    She looks like an old hag. In fact like an old used up prostitute. She comes across as a sad old tart who missed her vocation as a prostitute as the only thing she thinks she has of value are her tits!

  3. keller
    February-28-2009 @ 10:49 am

    Her face looks awful BUT her body looks great. I don’t see ANY cellulite at all. For 42 her legs and torso look great.

  4. May
    February-28-2009 @ 11:16 am

    her body looks great for her age and just in general…her face…no blonde over 25 should dare leave the house without make up.

  5. Tweet
    February-28-2009 @ 11:32 am

    If you want an example of looking great at 42, perhaps you should look to Halle Berry or Salma Hayek…this one looks at least 55

  6. parissucksliterally
    February-28-2009 @ 11:42 am

    her body minus the nasty tits looks fabulous. It is her face that is busted.

  7. Angelina Jolie's forehead VEIN
    February-28-2009 @ 12:44 pm

    This is jokes, after looking at Megan Foxs pictures!

  8. February-28-2009 @ 1:39 pm

    She is my favorite. Just saw her on tall personals site “”"” tallkiss.com “”"”"” last week.

    I am wondering what kind of relationship she is looking for on that site.Is she single?

  9. MikeC...
    February-28-2009 @ 3:38 pm

    How does that old saying go???? “Rode hard and put away wet” I think….

  10. supernova
    February-28-2009 @ 5:48 pm

    She doesn’t look much better with makeup. Hag is right.

  11. mMm
    February-28-2009 @ 7:22 pm

    Better than her going bare-assed, like she has done so much lately!

  12. Stephi
    March-1-2009 @ 12:37 am

    I really don’t think she looks too bad at all considering her age. It’s just such a shock to see her without her layers of makeup and hairspray that she usually wears. If she went a bit lighter on the makeup it wouldn’t be such a huge contrast when we see pictures like this one. Yes, she’s looking older but…newsflash: she is! Her body is still looking amazing!

  13. March-1-2009 @ 3:33 pm

    Considering her age.. oh effing please, this skank needs to retire her ho straps and stripper pole , for her age pleaseeeee, the hag is 40 something please .. Angela Basset is 51 and Pam looks like her mother.. give me a break. Halle berry is pam’s age and look at that difference!

  14. March-1-2009 @ 3:34 pm

    Make-up my ass.. all that damn plastic surgery has did a turn on her ass!

  15. March-1-2009 @ 3:36 pm

    She looks like Bette Davis when she played “what ever happen to Baby Jane”"” EWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  16. March-2-2009 @ 12:42 pm

    plastic surgery gone bad and old age catching up.. too much damn sun , partying and drinking a dn drugs!!!

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared.

Want your image to show up? Get a gravatar, it's easy.