FOR ALL YOU NAYSAYERS

Posted Thursday, August 16th, 2007 at 11:40 am
Filed under: ,

believe-ad.JPG

There was recent controversy over Britney Spears’ ad for her latest fragrance, Believe. A New York Post story suggested that a stylist named Kylie Cavaco took the body shot and Brit’s head was later superimposed on top after the songstress stormed out of the shoot.

britney-belly-ad.jpg

But upon close examination, it’s clear that it was indeed Britney who took the gorgeous shot.

The moles, the bellybutton, the ring — it’s all the same.

No body double. Just some good Photoshopping and even better lighting.

Take that, haters!

[MFF, JJB]

Your Ad Here

44 Comments to “FOR ALL YOU NAYSAYERS”

  1. Anonymous
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 11:43 am
    1

    that proves nothing! that picture was photoshopped to hell and back she don’t look like that anymore - please refer to many of the candids we see of her on a daily basis!!!
  2. Da Devil
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 11:43 am
    2

    I have never though she was “doubled”.
    she has a nice frame, she has never been super skinny, but not for that she looks nice when she is styled by herself.
    Only when she is art directed, and styled by otehr she becomes “clean”.
  3. kat
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 11:44 am
    3

    lol that doesnt mean they didnt cut half of it off on the sides! photoshop is an amazing program ;)
  4. Lola Lola
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 11:44 am
    4

    Who is that? (naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay)
  5. crumbly
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 11:48 am
    5

    they could’ve easily added those “personal” touches later to make it look like the real deal, duh!
  6. hotbitch
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 11:50 am
    6

    What’s the big deal when both pics are damn near identical??? It’s obviously her and we all know that everyone gets airbrushed in photos.
  7. starr
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 12:09 pm
    7

    Who wants to smell like Britney? ewwie…
  8. Czarina
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 12:14 pm
    8

    HATE HATE HATE HATE……….she’s still white trash!!
  9. sb
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 12:20 pm
    9

    The biggest clues aside from the fact that it just doesn’t bear any resemblance to her are the hands and body proportions. You can PS in moles, belly rings, etc. but those are not Britney’s stubby fingers & hands nor is that torso the same. Let’s face it, they spent alot of $$$ for this product & she’s torpedoed her reputation. They’re just trying to salvage something from this trainwreck.
  10. Barks
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 12:22 pm
    10

    We’re talking about Hollywood here. If the can make Yoda walk and Captain Dan have no legs they can certainly put 3 fake moles and a bellybutton ring on a PA and call her Britney. Advertising firms aren’t know for their ethics.
  11. no, no, no
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 12:31 pm
    11

    It still looks more like a youny Mariah Carey than it does like Britney. And Brit looked like that five years ago, certainly not now!
  12. starr
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 12:31 pm
    12

    It’s Lieutenant Dan! Love him, lol…
  13. OK
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 12:32 pm
    13

    Brit wants us to believe. Well I do, I believe she is a nasty, bitchy, racist, slut, terrible mother. I also believe that she has no talent as a singer or entertainer!
  14. Lola Lola
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 12:55 pm
    14

    sb, spot on! All her investors ae running for any last cash before this chick moves into a shack in the ozarks.
  15. Pingback:
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 1:08 pm
    15
    Scandelirious Exclusive: Celebrity perfumes, part 2 — SCANDELIRIOUS

    [...] speculation that Britney’s head was put on a ramdom girl’s body for this shot, but some clever investigating has proved that’s probably not the [...]
  16. parissucksliterally
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 1:09 pm
    16

    that picture looks like a still from her “Sometimes” video. She is 16 in that photo. what a JOKE.
    Barks, you NAILED it- once again.
  17. Anony
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
    17

    THANK YOU Barks! Puhlease people… Even a beginner can copy paste moles.

    Oh, and I never knew Arasto was such a britney lover.
  18. Anonymous
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 1:38 pm
    18

    GOD i feel bad for that bird
  19. Jane
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 1:39 pm
    19

    LoL..Yea take that haters!
  20. NARC
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 1:43 pm
    20

    IT DOESN’T MATTER IF IT WAS ANOTHER PERSON’S BODY OR IF THEY PHOTOSHOPPED HER TO LOOK LIKE SHE HAD SOMEONE ELSE’S BODY.

    EITHER WAY IT IS A BULLSHIT REPRESENTATION OF HER AS SHE IS NOW - IT IS A TOTAL LIE.
  21. Janie
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 1:46 pm
    21

    Do they really expect anybody to believe this is what she looks like? They could’ve photographed a stack of pancakes and it would’ve looked more like Britney Spears. With this much airbrushing they might as well have hired a cartoonist to just draw pictures of her instead.
  22. alice-malice
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 1:46 pm
    22

    they photoshopped her to the point of not looking like her… check this website out:
    http://www.iwanexstudio.com/
    click on portfolios and you can see how much they “fix” celebrities…
  23. bob
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 1:47 pm
    23

    she’s very pretty fuch the hates if you don’t like her do away stupide people
  24. john
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 1:49 pm
    24

    she’ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss hotttttttttttttt people are jealous because she’s still hot haha i love it
  25. b
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 2:04 pm
    25

    Compare this ad with her allure pics, it’s her body folks, stop grasping at straws. ;)
  26. supernova
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 2:05 pm
    26

    NAYSAYERS? Please don’t tell me you’re THAT niave?? SHE’S BEEN PHOTOSHOPPED.
  27. Anonymous
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 2:27 pm
    27

    LOL her allure pics are a photoshop masterpiece
  28. me!
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 2:38 pm
    28

    Are you that dumb … they can airbrush in the belly ring & moles - anything in possible - get a grip u douche!
  29. keller
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 2:50 pm
    29

    What about the bony shoulders and the very long, thin hands and fingers????Can someone please explain who these belong to? Certainly not Britney that’s for sure - she has stubby, bloated, chubby hands and fingers. Also what about her pitbull neck? Where DAT go?
  30. Stephi
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 4:54 pm
    30

    Thanks for posting this Arasto but you can never really stop Britney haters. It’s obvious that a body double wasn’t used and of course they did a bit of airbrushing…LIKE ALL PHOTOS! It’s not like Heidi Klum or Gisele’s bodies look exactly realistic in magazines either. Honestly though I don’t think Britney’s body looks a whole lot different than the picture…slightly bigger but not that different of a shape. Who cares anyway? Oh yeah that’s right all you people who have nothing better to do than pick on somebody you don’t even know all the time. Maybe instead of focusing on her flaws all the time you should work on your own. Seriously…its getting old.
  31. Just asking
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 5:39 pm
    31

    Ok first off, since when is Brit racist? You’re an idiot, she may be bitchy at times (who wouldn’t constantly hounded) but she’s never come even remotely close to being racist. You must have her confused with Paris. Also, the hands? She has short stubby hands yes (as do I). Elegant nails can do wonders to elongate and shape your hands. Photoshop helps too. That is her body, just sleekened out a bit with Photoshop. Look at her greatest hits cd. Same thing. That is Brit.
  32. Agustina
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 7:02 pm
    32

    I still don’t think that’s her. Too photoshopped, too perfect. Nothing like her.
  33. RaraAvis
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 7:11 pm
    33

    Fake is fake. I’ve seen candid photos of Heidi Klum and Gisele and they look the same as they look in fashion shoots. This is not “a bit of airbrushing”. This is FAKE FAKE FAKE. A sow’s ear photoshopped to look like a silk purse.
  34. Chachi
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 7:17 pm
    34

    hahaha just asking-just the thought of her having a greatest hits CD!
  35. supernova
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 9:22 pm
    35

    She’s a fat sloppy pig. Making her look like a young, nubile teenager is a damn farce (and yes, other celebrities are airbrush to the same ridiculous extent).
  36. jelly
    Posted: Aug 16th, 2007 at 10:37 pm
    36

    Good-Lord!!!…..did she really think we wouldn’t notice…CRAZY Britney!!
    I hate it when celebrities think the public are stupid…..don’t buy the product….she’ll get the message eventually.
  37. loool
    Posted: Aug 17th, 2007 at 3:35 am
    37

    Don’t care still don’t believe it they could have just drawn them moles on or something either way she’s still trash!
  38. Chantelle
    Posted: Aug 17th, 2007 at 3:38 am
    38

    I wonder what that perfume smells like….probably Cheetos, beer and B.O.
    Yum

    And why is it called “Believe”?
  39. jelly
    Posted: Aug 17th, 2007 at 9:43 am
    39

    It should have been called “Hard to Believe” ….hehe!!
  40. jelly
    Posted: Aug 17th, 2007 at 9:45 am
    40

    Or ….how about “Un-believable”!!!….anyone want to add to that??
  41. MALLORYA
    Posted: Aug 17th, 2007 at 9:46 am
    41

    Yeah!!!…..STINKY BRIT PERFUME.
  42. J24
    Posted: Aug 17th, 2007 at 9:47 am
    42

    Suspecious Smell….by Britney :)
  43. nylon
    Posted: Aug 17th, 2007 at 12:34 pm
    43

    why don’t you look at her pictures for her ‘get back’ video she looks like a freakin hippo! sorry brit, but u don’t look like that n e more!
  44. nylon
    Posted: Aug 17th, 2007 at 12:35 pm
    44

    by the way the allure pics came out from her photoshoot and they were photoshopped as well!
SexyComments by BorkWeb

Leave a Reply