PRINCE HARRY DOES ‘RADAR’

radar-prince.jpg

Other magazines may be doing the usual sit-downs with movie stars, but Radar puts Prince Harry (or at least Prince Harry’s head) on its September cover - barefoot and wearing boxers, no less.

They offer “an insider’s look” at the wild life of the 22-year-old royal and the palace’s attempts to quiet him, or at least sweep up after him.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

21 Comments

  1. Barks
    August-7-2007 @ 3:47 pm

    I thought the UK had stricter libel laws than the US, how do they get away with this?

  2. parissucksliterally
    August-7-2007 @ 3:57 pm

    His Royal Hotness, indeed.
    Man, what I’d do to that guy……….

  3. lolly
    August-7-2007 @ 4:03 pm

    i was wondering that barks, call me a quaker, but i like my royalty to maintain that high brow image :O(

  4. Irene
    August-7-2007 @ 4:04 pm

    My god, the number of times I’d drag him around the room…

  5. Lisa
    August-7-2007 @ 4:17 pm

    ewww

  6. EAT IT
    August-7-2007 @ 5:27 pm

    i thought there was a chance harry isn’t prince charles’ son. but he really looks like him here.

  7. Supersonic
    August-7-2007 @ 6:00 pm

    You can get away with a LOT print wise over here. Its just a different culture, there seems to be more rebelliousness here than in the US (i could be wrong).
    Anyway, I always liked Hazza best, he’s a badass he might as well be seeing as the monarchy isn’t so popular anymore.
    ALSO, where can I find this mag, it actually looks interesting.

  8. parissucksliterally
    August-7-2007 @ 6:42 pm

    Harry has always looked like Charles, IMO. As a little kid, I pitied him for it. Now he is way hotter than Wills. Wills peaked at 17, which is sad.

  9. Stephi
    August-7-2007 @ 8:13 pm

    Wow I am kinda surprised they dared to do this. The royals are normally pretty strict with what gets printed regarding them, but I guess they can’t really control it. They could sue however, because this certainly doesn’t paint Harry in a very good light. I really like Harry though, he seems down to earth a like a normal guy- something I’m sure his mama would be very proud of.

  10. chicken little
    August-7-2007 @ 8:18 pm

    SUPER HOT!

  11. snipe
    August-7-2007 @ 8:46 pm

    Huh. And to think I used to pity Harry for being the fugly one.
    .
    That said, this kind of posturing is bound to make people wonder why they pay to support the monarchy. If Harry’s just going to be another male Paris, then let him support himself!

  12. Barks
    August-7-2007 @ 8:46 pm

    That surprises me supersonic. I watch Kathy Griffin and before and during her trip to UK she was schooled in what she could and could not say on stage because of their strict slander laws. Does this not apply to print mags?

  13. me!
    August-8-2007 @ 12:57 am

    The U.K is far more liberal than the U.S … in everday life & when it comes to media / publishing … u pretty much have carte blanche to print what you like & also in the U.K they don’t sue constantly like they do in the U.S - The U.K is far less conservative than the U.S - I just always think about the janet Jackson nip slip & the whole furore it caused over here - in the U.K that would be laughed at … anyway, having read the article they have so many things wrong that I don’t rlly think it has any merit - & also, they claim they interviewed an ex-bodyguard … that would nvr happen - they’re head would be on a plate if they spoke out … so, overall the article is a load of crap & most of it is made up … though, everyone knows prince harry is pretty wild anyway.

  14. BeJeeBus
    August-8-2007 @ 5:04 am

    I never pitied Harry, I always loved me some of him, mainly because William was a spitting image of his father the toad. And still is. He should be lucky if Kate decides to marry him. Harry on the other hand is pure sex. Maybe because Charles isn’t his father, and he should thank his lucky stars because of that.

  15. Janie
    August-8-2007 @ 6:47 am

    I never bought into the conspiracy theory that Harry is not Charles’ son. Look at his face they are so similar! Plus as tight a thumb as the royals kept on Di if she was cheating they’ve already had him tested!

  16. OhHellNo!
    August-8-2007 @ 7:09 am

    Oh Lordy - he looks HOT!

  17. parissucksliterally
    August-8-2007 @ 7:18 am

    BJB…if anything, IMO Harry was the one who always looked like Charles- he had huge ears and a squinty face. Wills looked exactly like Di……strange you saw the opposite.

  18. BeJeeBus
    August-8-2007 @ 7:55 am

    Janie, who’s to say they didn’t have him tested? But they are not going to tell the results to the world.. I don’t know why, but I just don’t get the Charles vibe from him, whereas Wills is both looks and behaves like him.

  19. whatever
    August-8-2007 @ 8:55 am

    Harry has to be the child of Charles because he looks so much like the Queen. And why would they not use his body? he takes his shirt off all the time while playing Polo and he has a great bod!

  20. Mariana
    August-8-2007 @ 9:27 am

    This doesn’t look real to me - it looks like a model’s body with a head pic of Harry on the body. Not to say that he wouldn’t do a shoot like this, but it really doesn’t look real to me. M.

  21. hotbitch
    August-8-2007 @ 11:13 am

    How YOU doing??????

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared.

Want your image to show up? Get a gravatar, it's easy.