Posted Friday, June 29th, 2007 at 1:44 pm
The gorgeous burlesque queen was on hand in Manchester, England today to promote MAC’s ‘Viva Glam’ campaign with a personal appearance and signing at the Selfridges department store.
|
beckham lover Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 1:48 pm |
1
i don’t like that dress. |
|
coco Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 1:59 pm |
2
go awayyyyyyy. |
|
parissucksliterally Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 2:00 pm |
3
she bores me. |
|
coco Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 2:10 pm |
4
exactly PSL…shes always the same thing, pale and in a dress(or in a cup) . boringgggggggg |
|
spinner Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 2:59 pm |
5
I think she has beautiful skin. |
|
nikka Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 3:34 pm |
6
But as someone pointed out in the last Dita/Viva Glam thread - why isn’t she wearing the lipstick? Strange. |
|
thighmegatampon Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 3:49 pm |
7
I get so bored seeing posts on her |
|
Supersonic Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 4:14 pm |
8
She was much more interesting when she was shimmying around in a cocktail glass, she’s clearly less comfortable here doing the PR circuit. Isn’t Eve a VIVA spokesperson and Debbie Harry? Why aren’t they doing any PR? |
|
Mac in Laguna Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 5:09 pm |
9
Screw all you Dita haters, the girl shows up ready… |
|
candyapple Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 5:12 pm |
10
^^^ Agree Mac in … Problem is she is showing up a little too much in my opinion. |
|
Picture Fashion Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 5:40 pm |
11
She just seems completely vapid. In interviews, totally dull. Blog author- stop saying effortless. |
|
jess Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 7:04 pm |
12
i would hardly say a full can of hairspray and 20 pounds of makeup is effortless…. UGLY and overrated. |
|
Steph Posted: Jun 29th, 2007 at 11:15 pm |
13
Gwen wore that dress already! |
|
just askin' Posted: Jun 30th, 2007 at 7:20 am |
14
I’d love to know how everyone can tell she’s not wearing MAC lipstick. Her glamorous look may not be effortless, but at least she makes the effort, and consistently. When have you ever seen her looking less than 100% perfectly put together? Her hair, makeup, dress, and accessories are always impeccable. MAC knew what they were doing when they signed her up to represent them. I get bored, too–with people carping on silly, unsubstantial things like her pale skin, her retro look, and her profession. But I know that the minute a photo of those overexposed Olsen haglettes show up, everyone will be happy again, fawning all over their fashion sense and their fabulous style. Because pale, skinny, washed-out, snarly-haired, crappily-dressed little garden gnomes are the true glamour icons, right? |
|
Supersonic Posted: Jun 30th, 2007 at 10:27 am |
15
Ha! ^^^ So true, I’d be the last person to like the Olsen twins over Dita, she’s a curvy burlesque icon with great style, talent and intelligence they are weird looking, scrawny rich vampires doing that DERELICTE look from Zoolander. I know which one I prefer. |
|
bluebird Posted: Jun 30th, 2007 at 10:30 am |
16
isn’t that the dress patricia arquette and gwen wore? the one where patricia’s boobs were spilling out? |
|
southern girl Posted: Jun 30th, 2007 at 11:36 am |
17
Dayum, this bitch is pasty as hell and her dress is wonkier than Paris’ eye! Why do you post about her so much Arasto? She’s not even hot, she looks like a GHOST! With RED ass lips nonetheless. |
|
BeJeeBus Posted: Jul 1st, 2007 at 4:10 am |
18
She’s not CUEVY! She was curvy once, she is scrawny as well now if you see her in her bikinis at shows. Her ribs are showing. I really can’t look at another pale “I’m so much better than you” picture. And this dress is the same as the red she wore 3 days ago, which was also Vivienne, just in another color and pattern. |
|
BeJeeBus Posted: Jul 1st, 2007 at 4:11 am |
19
CURVY* |
|
hello Posted: Sep 5th, 2007 at 8:51 pm |
20
hello, cool site, i love your work this is my blog: http://yandex.ru - look at it now! |
