The gorgeous burlesque queen was on hand in Manchester, England today to promote MAC’s ‘Viva Glam’ campaign with a personal appearance and signing at the Selfridges department store.
-
Sponsored Links
- LOVE NOTES LEFT BEHIND
- GUERILLA KNITTING CRAZE SWEEPS AMERICA
- LUK CHAI THE BABY ELEPHANT LEARNS TO SWIM
- THE MILKY WAY AS NEVER SEEN BEFORE
- MAN ACCUSED OF RUNNING OVER DAUGHTER FOR BEING “TOO WESTERNIZED”
- RUSSIAN VODKA GOES DOWN
- BABES WITH BULLETS
- HOOTERS WAITRESSES FILE LAWSUIT AGAINST COMPANY
- PAINTING OF DISFIGURED IRAQ VET GOES ON DISPLAY AT NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY
- SEA BLOBS INDICATE GLOBAL WARMING?
Loading...
20 Comments
i don’t like that dress.
go awayyyyyyy.
she bores me.
exactly PSL…shes always the same thing, pale and in a dress(or in a cup) . boringgggggggg
I think she has beautiful skin.
But as someone pointed out in the last Dita/Viva Glam thread - why isn’t she wearing the lipstick? Strange.
I get so bored seeing posts on her
She was much more interesting when she was shimmying around in a cocktail glass, she’s clearly less comfortable here doing the PR circuit. Isn’t Eve a VIVA spokesperson and Debbie Harry? Why aren’t they doing any PR?
Screw all you Dita haters, the girl shows up ready…
^^^ Agree Mac in … Problem is she is showing up a little too much in my opinion.
She just seems completely vapid. In interviews, totally dull. Blog author- stop saying effortless.
i would hardly say a full can of hairspray and 20 pounds of makeup is effortless…. UGLY and overrated.
Gwen wore that dress already!
I’d love to know how everyone can tell she’s not wearing MAC lipstick.
Her glamorous look may not be effortless, but at least she makes the effort, and consistently. When have you ever seen her looking less than 100% perfectly put together? Her hair, makeup, dress, and accessories are always impeccable. MAC knew what they were doing when they signed her up to represent them.
I get bored, too–with people carping on silly, unsubstantial things like her pale skin, her retro look, and her profession.
But I know that the minute a photo of those overexposed Olsen haglettes show up, everyone will be happy again, fawning all over their fashion sense and their fabulous style. Because pale, skinny, washed-out, snarly-haired, crappily-dressed little garden gnomes are the true glamour icons, right?
Ha! ^^^ So true, I’d be the last person to like the Olsen twins over Dita, she’s a curvy burlesque icon with great style, talent and intelligence they are weird looking, scrawny rich vampires doing that DERELICTE look from Zoolander. I know which one I prefer.
isn’t that the dress patricia arquette and gwen wore? the one where patricia’s boobs were spilling out?
Dayum, this bitch is pasty as hell and her dress is wonkier than Paris’ eye!
Why do you post about her so much Arasto? She’s not even hot, she looks like a GHOST! With RED ass lips nonetheless.
She’s not CUEVY! She was curvy once, she is scrawny as well now if you see her in her bikinis at shows. Her ribs are showing. I really can’t look at another pale “I’m so much better than you” picture. And this dress is the same as the red she wore 3 days ago, which was also Vivienne, just in another color and pattern.
CURVY*
hello, cool site, i love your work this is my blog: http://yandex.ru - look at it now!