L.C. SHOWS OFF HER CELLULITE AND MASSIVE FEET

Being young, beautiful, and famous can’t guard you from Mother Nature and even The Hills star Lauren Conrad showed signs of aging when she left her Los Angeles home Tuesday afternoon.

As the 22-year-old reality star ran into the sunshine to meet her friend, Conrad’s movement was captured in a rather unflattering light. So much for all those session at the gym!

Meanwhile, LC matched her tank top with some fashionable fringed Gladiator sandals, but her footwear only accentuated her surprisingly mammoth feet!!


[Flynet, Fame]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

32 Comments

  1. Shane
    July-8-2008 @ 9:10 pm

    gross!

  2. THE DEVIL
    July-8-2008 @ 9:17 pm

    she should bound those feet! like chinese women two centuries ago! how can she walk with normal feet?

  3. THE DEVIL
    July-8-2008 @ 9:22 pm

    damn those are UGLY and BIG feet

  4. AMANDA
    July-8-2008 @ 9:51 pm

    IVE GOT LEGS LIKE THAT…..SOOOOOO WHAT !!

  5. July-8-2008 @ 10:13 pm

    I just see some skin moving looking like cellullite, but i dont see as much cellullite as you say… just in main pictre. Love her sandals :)

  6. Anonymous
    July-8-2008 @ 10:14 pm

    LOL damn! I can’t believe those are her legs! She was just on the cover of Shape magazine braggin about her top notch fitness routine.

  7. My2cents
    July-8-2008 @ 10:45 pm

    Those are so not her legs. These are doctored pics.

  8. July-8-2008 @ 11:03 pm

    not her legs!!

  9. Anonymous
    July-8-2008 @ 11:12 pm

    Even if those are her legs, so what? I’m not crazy about the girl but good lord, she’s in great shape. Everyone has celulite! It pisses me off that people seem so scandalized that when in the wrong light her legs look less than perfect.

  10. boo
    July-8-2008 @ 11:49 pm

    dammit. I have those shoes. In two colors.

  11. Stephi
    July-9-2008 @ 12:23 am

    She’s running of course her legs are going to look a bit flabby. I think she’s got a great body and this is just an unfortunate photo that really could be taken of anybody. I think the shoes look terrible on her though, they make her legs look short.

  12. adam
    July-9-2008 @ 12:26 am

    i’ll admit i’m a bit surprised because i thought she had a tighter frame, but is this thread what ppl really want when they say, ‘this is an entertainment blog and that’s all we should talk about at FYB you losers?’

  13. parissucksliterally
    July-9-2008 @ 12:43 am

    That is not cellulite. They are stretch marks. She is walking, so her skin is moving a little, and the lighting makes them looks worse than they are. Trust me, I know what I am talking about. NOT cellulite.

  14. anon1
    July-9-2008 @ 2:35 am

    You know these stupid camera lenses pick up things that the human eye doesn’t even notice. So unfair cuz she has gorgeous gams.

  15. boohoo
    July-9-2008 @ 2:54 am

    I can’t stop looking at those ugly ass hooked toes of hers. Nonetheless her face is still nice to look at.

  16. marina
    July-9-2008 @ 5:48 am

    there is nothing wrong with legs or feet !

  17. joycat
    July-9-2008 @ 9:33 am

    It’s just her movement and the shadows being created by the light. In several of the thumbnails, her legs look great!

  18. sandie
    July-9-2008 @ 9:46 am

    I didn’t know she had that much cellulite.

  19. Anonymous
    July-9-2008 @ 9:48 am

    She MUST be in her period. Cellulite does not appear that suddenly, she normally has nice average legs.

  20. girl
    July-9-2008 @ 10:02 am

    It isn’t about AGE, it’s about FEMALE PHYSIQUE, FAT tissue, women do have that, even the slim ones. IT’S NORMAL. Sometimes you see it more clearly, depends on how the light comes.

  21. Jane
    July-9-2008 @ 10:05 am

    That’s not cellulite. It’s mottled light hitting her thighs while she’s moving. Ridiculous. Not everyone can look camera-ready perfect all the time.

  22. Anonymous
    July-9-2008 @ 10:15 am

    um, how come only one pic shows the “cellulite” but the others don’t? it’s just a bad shot or it’s been photoshopped, that girl doesn’t have cellulite.

  23. anonymous
    July-9-2008 @ 10:26 am

    Lauren is gorgeous leave her alone.

  24. parissucksliterally
    July-9-2008 @ 11:17 am

    READ people…it is STRETCH MARKS. NOT CELLULITE.

  25. abigail
    July-9-2008 @ 11:30 am

    Blah Blah Blah, she is a human being just like us, get over it.

  26. Annie Nonymous
    July-9-2008 @ 11:35 am

    Parissucksliterally: You silly bint, those aren’t stretch marks.

  27. leslie
    July-9-2008 @ 1:03 pm

    90% of women have cellulite, so why don’t you quit acting like it’s the most disgusting thing in the world. You’re a huge douchebag. The shoes are awful, but she’s got great legs.

  28. parissucksliterally
    July-9-2008 @ 1:30 pm

    YES they are…she is running, so the skin is moving- that is what it looks like. I have seen plenty of stretch marked legs, and those are a pair of marked legs….same dimpled effect.

  29. girl with cellulite
    July-9-2008 @ 2:09 pm

    Ok she’s human….thanks God every girl had cellulite

  30. ~~
    July-9-2008 @ 4:13 pm

    She just looks like a woman to me.

  31. Anonymous
    July-10-2008 @ 3:57 am

    i think its just natural movement of skin, and whats underneath, kind of happens, unless there is no fat, or only muscle, and that wouldn’t be so pretty.

  32. leah
    July-30-2008 @ 12:21 pm

    Doctored! Look at every picture and then look at this one again. Her left leg has a clear line of demarcation where they didn’t blend it in enough in photoshop!!! Her calf looks thick then suddenly thin and whiter. Nice try though.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared.

Want your image to show up? Get a gravatar, it's easy.