Posted Monday, June 4th, 2007 at 7:48 pm
Filed under: Chloë-Sevigny
We love Chloë Sevigny and he cunning ability to effortlessly look like an 80s glamour model, but it would have been great if she would have classed it up for the big CFDA Fashion Awards.
B*tch is fierce when she’s all decked out!
|
candyapple Posted: Jun 4th, 2007 at 8:01 pm |
1
Not so fierce here Arasto. |
|
just askin' Posted: Jun 4th, 2007 at 8:04 pm |
2
I’m not sure how that nightgown-inspired rag constitutes fierce, Arasto, but whatever. She has nice legs, I will give you that much. |
|
just askin' Posted: Jun 4th, 2007 at 8:09 pm |
3
PS Would it have killed Ms. Sevigny to get a mani-pedi in honor of the occasion? Goofy orangey-red lipstick, but not a trace of color on her toes or fingers–bah! And those chandelier earrings are totally off the already dubious mark. PPS Thank you for the nice big pictures, Arasto! I’m so glad you’re bringing them back. How else would I have been able to comment on Chloe’s fug cuticles? |
|
Randi Posted: Jun 4th, 2007 at 8:13 pm |
4
Glamour model my ass — Ugly cocksucker with bad taste. |
|
THE DEVIL Posted: Jun 4th, 2007 at 8:23 pm |
5
eeeeeewwwwww, |
|
Aysla Posted: Jun 4th, 2007 at 9:36 pm |
6
Arasto suggested she *didn’t* class it up for this event, but that if she had- she would have been “fierce” ;). Anyway I think she’s a butterface and not a very good actress, but I agree with just askin’… she’s got great legs. |
|
Stephi Posted: Jun 4th, 2007 at 10:15 pm |
7
She is just not attractive at all. Very bad features and while I lot of people say she’s not known for her looks but for her style, I’m sorry I really don’t see it. Yes her style is certainly different and eccentric, but to be stylish in my opinion you actually have to look good and attractive. |