THE BRANGELINA HOAX: UNFOLDED

Remember when Entertainment Tonight broke “news” that Angelina Jolie had given birth to twins on Friday? Well, here’s some insight on how it all went down.

Angie’s attorneys say someone was posing as Holly Goline, Jolie’s personal assistant, and sent out false information about the movie star. The source for the ET report was an e-mail supposedly from Goline.

Was ET punk’d? It isn’t clear, since the show initiated its own contact with Goline after hearing rumours the babies had been born in France. The individual who made the contact was an ET producer who had worked with Goline while at CNN and kept Goline’s e-mail address. In an e-mail exchange, Goline - or the impostor - said she was there for the deliveries and everyone was doing well. Pressed by ET for more information, the person said she could say no more. They ran with it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

7 Comments

  1. Meaghan
    June-3-2008 @ 10:44 am

    I kind of doubted that she had the babies, she didn’t deny it once she had Shiloh so I doubt she would now, especially since they have privacy in their France mansion!!!

  2. Recession Proof State
    June-3-2008 @ 10:52 am

    I heard they want 15+ million for pictures for those blobs.
    ==
    Why cant they have more class and just do it for free?
    MANY of big time “celebs” have done it for free…………….Is Buttalina more important then that? And I want to see the Financial Statements that show where this money is going to….Im sure that more than half, will go fatten their pockets up.
    ==
    I dont trust anyone that is willing to pimp out kids.

  3. She
    June-3-2008 @ 10:55 am

    Yet another entry in the journal of things that don’t matter.

  4. jadey
    June-3-2008 @ 12:39 pm

    No wonder we get all these crap from the tabloids about Brangie, I guess this impostor has been feeding the tabs their 2% concentrate!

  5. fame
    June-3-2008 @ 12:47 pm

    Recession Proof State
    Posted: Jun 3rd, 2008 at 10:52 am 2I heard they want 15+ million for pictures for those blobs.
    ==
    Why cant they have more class and just do it for free?

    ***********************************************
    Why is it classy to make the rich richer?

    When they give to the mags/tabs, they will make lots of money by selling lots of magazines, and the money will just go the pocket of the publisher of these mags.

    Whereas if they sell it, as we know Brad and Angelina has a foundation and for sure, they will put the proceeds of the sale to their foundation again. They donated the whole amount of what they earned from Shiloh pics, to various charities, i.,e. Doctors without Borders, Global children’s fund, etc.

    I admire Brad and Angelina for doing it.

    Why are dont you critize Jennifer Lopez and her husband, who are real pimps of their twins, they just pocketed the US$6m paid to them by People Mag. Also, Christina Aquilera, Nicole Richie, Gwen Stephanie, these women have all sold their baby pics for their own needs!

  6. EAT IT
    June-3-2008 @ 2:26 pm

    some posters still post about the “blob” comment? parents ‘endearingly’ call their kids lots of things: devil child, little monster, etc… maybe “blob” is more offensive because it sounds like a thing with no will of its own. LOL
    -
    being a celeb, there’s always a chance of a leak everywhere.

  7. Stephi
    June-4-2008 @ 1:38 am

    The reason why they are releasing the babies pictures for free is so that they can give the profits to their charities. If a magazine is willing to pay that much money, at least it can go towards something worthwhile. I feel like magazines print so much crap about celebrities sometimes that the least they can do is give them money for their charities when they have their babies.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared.

Want your image to show up? Get a gravatar, it's easy.