Gwyneth Paltrow elevated her style quotient to dizzying heights wearing a micro minidress by Balmain at the British premiere for her film Iron Man at the Odeon Leicester Square in London on Thursday.
The 35-year-old actress has turned in her long, straight, parted-in-the-middle hair-did for a bouncier shoulder-brushing hairdo. And Gwynnie has been rocking some may-jah sky-high stilettos lately, even at the risk of towering over her co-stars.
We’re loving Paltrow’s new look with bouncier hair, stylish clothes and a disdain for gravity. Your thoughts on the new Gwyneth 2.0?
24 Comments
i hav never been a fan of hers but noe i am her number one fan!! Amazing legs and fitness!!
DAYYYUUMMM…mother of 2, people!! Mother of 2!!!!!!!!!!
WOW!!! Gorgeous!!!
Nice!
gourgeousness. she looks amazing.
does a personality come with the legs?
I’m just not overly impressed with her legs - overall an okay looking woman and definitely in shape, but nothing to write home about in the leg department. I don’t think they are overly shapely and in fact, think they are still a tad thick…I think Cameron Diaz’s lefs are fantastic and something to rave about. Gwyneth’s…not so much.
That skirt looks like the same one that Mariah Carey had on the other day.
yeah her legs do look a tad thick……WTF.she looks great,and for a mother of two, fanfuckingtastic.
CC you are out of your mind!!! Thick??? Your head is think!!!
While I loved the long hair while she had it (don’t know why), the new shorter ‘do and fab leg exposure takes 10 years off her age…well, actually she is young…it’s just that the mother earth hair-do she used to have made her look too old. She looks happy and sexy. What more could anyone want?
England can keep her.I hear they have great healthcare you just have to get on a waiting list for an appointment.
I noted that she looked great and in shape…but I do not think her legs are anything overly spectacular. They are fine, but a bit on the thicker side in proportion to her slight frame. She is an okay looking woman, nothing extraordinary, nothing offensive or unattractive. It doesn’t mean I am thickheaded, I am just not in awe of an average feature of hers. To each his/her own. Relax people…she’s human like everyone else and lookings uncannily like her mother.
Gwyneth has an innate ability to even make outfits like this bland, she still looks good but could I care less? Its doubtful.
On a sidenote; the higher the heel the fucking better. I LOVE ALL HER SHOES LATELY!
i know she can’t help it but there’s not a dahm thing attractive about pale legs. i don’t care how long and toned they are, to me it looks like a sick ghost.
another elitist snob.
Her legs are a rival to Katie Holmes’s! Hot. Nevertheless, there’s always somthing off and it’s usually her hair and make-up! Oh and looky here - her hair and make pretty much suck. When she succeeds at the whole package I will be the first cheering her on. For now, sideway thumbs.
Atleast she’s not a skank.
I agree that her legs look thick, that she’s boring, and I’ll add my own opinion that I do not see anything attractive about her whatsoever. Plus, she’s a moron.
She looks amazing! And her legs are to die for…
Oops! I’m sorry, I did the 8:06 pm comment, not 4:54 - I did not realize the nick was wrong on my computer.
Sorry, 4:54!!!
i’ve always thought she has great long legs. not the best, but great still. it helps she’s so tall.
she has been looking very good lately.
she is way tooo old to be wearing a dress that short!!! utterly ridiculous!
Loves it.