And nobody cares Gavin is just on your gravy train until his career takes off.
Anonymous
February-26-2008 @ 3:19 pm
looks like a marc jacobs ad
Eve
February-26-2008 @ 3:25 pm
Amazing! Looks Stunning!
EAT IT
February-26-2008 @ 3:30 pm
love it. looks like a fashion ad.
Eve
February-26-2008 @ 3:31 pm
whats stunning that 40yr old woman dressed like a 5yr old.
boohoo
February-26-2008 @ 3:48 pm
Boooo, not my favorite look for her.
towa
February-26-2008 @ 3:50 pm
SO FUCKEN H O T
spinner
February-26-2008 @ 3:51 pm
What a great cover!! Love it!!
LISA MARIE
February-26-2008 @ 4:01 pm
Shes still BEAUTIFUL when shes pouting and looking pissed off, can she ever look bad? I dont think so….
Min
February-26-2008 @ 4:03 pm
Might be ok if it weren’t for the red eyes. It makes her look either really tired or stoned…and it’s not easy to make Gwen look bad.
Anonymous
February-26-2008 @ 4:35 pm
A good job in photoshopping her chin.
duh
February-26-2008 @ 4:48 pm
are those nylon toe slips she’s wearing? and is that a paper plane on her head? god these fashion phonies must think we’re all idiots.
Gypsytrill
February-26-2008 @ 5:02 pm
Zoolander would be so proud.
lividlover
February-26-2008 @ 5:08 pm
amazing! finally, something artsy and interesting to look at.
Anonymous
February-26-2008 @ 5:27 pm
Finally, a look of hers I can get behind - LOVE IT!!!
Supersonic
February-26-2008 @ 5:33 pm
Looks like a younger but by no means hotter version of Vivienne Westwood. HOT. I like this.
Stephi
February-26-2008 @ 5:40 pm
The cover is certainly cool but I don’t see how anyone could really think she looks beautiful in this shot. It’s quite scary looking I think. I like this whole look for her better though, reminds me of her back in her No Doubt days of crazy hair and makeup.
Agustina
February-26-2008 @ 6:08 pm
I don’t really like her, but the cover is okay. Interesting.
just askin'
February-26-2008 @ 6:17 pm
Hate the makeup, hate the hair (WTF–is that a paper airplane in her hair?), especially the color. Gwen looks positively dreadful here. This is not a flattering photo shoot by any means.
But for some reason, I’m not hating the dress. I might even like that multicolored harlequin print…
Thats right.
February-26-2008 @ 6:32 pm
Don’t believe one optimistic word from any public figure about the economy or humanity in general. They are all part of the problem. Its like a game of Monopoly. In America, the richest 1% now hold 1/2 OF ALL UNITED STATES WEALTH. Unlike ‘lesser’ estimates, this includes all stocks, bonds, cash, and material assets held by America’s richest 1%. Even that filthy pig Oprah acknowledged that it was at about 50% in 2006. Naturally, she put her own ‘humanitarian’ spin on it. Calling attention to her own ‘good will’. WHAT A DISGUSTING HYPOCRITE SLOB. THE RICHEST 1% HAVE LITERALLY MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. Don’t fall for all of their ‘humanitarian’ CRAP. ITS A SHAM. THESE PEOPLE ARE CAUSING THE SAME PROBLEMS THEY PRETEND TO CARE ABOUT. Ask any professor of economics. Money does not grow on trees. The government can’t just print up more on a whim. At any given time, there is a relative limit to the wealth within ANY economy of ANY size. So when too much wealth accumulates at the top, the middle class slip further into debt and the lower class further into poverty. A similar rule applies worldwide. The world’s richest 1% now own over 40% of ALL WORLD WEALTH. This is EVEN AFTER you account for all of this ‘good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS from celebrities and executives. ITS A SHAM. As they get richer and richer, less wealth is left circulating beneath them. This is the single greatest underlying cause for the current US recession. The middle class can no longer afford to sustain their share of the economy. Their wealth has been gradually transfered to the richest 1%. One way or another, we suffer because of their incredible greed. We are talking about TRILLIONS of dollars. Transfered FROM US TO THEM. Over a period of about 27 years. Thats Reaganomics for you. The wealth does not ‘trickle down’ as we were told it would. It just accumulates at the top. Shrinking the middle class and expanding the lower class. Causing a domino effect of socio-economic problems. But the rich will never stop. They will never settle for a reasonable share of ANYTHING. They will do whatever it takes to get even richer. Leaving even less of the pie for the other 99% of us to share. At the same time, they throw back a few tax deductable crumbs and call themselves ‘humanitarians’. IT CAN’T WORK THIS WAY. This is going to end just like a game of Monopoly. The current US recession will drag on for years and lead into the worst US depression of all time. The richest 1% will live like royalty while the rest of us fight over jobs, food, and gasoline. Crime, poverty, and suicide will skyrocket. So don’t fall for all of this PR CRAP from Hollywood, Pro Sports, and Wall Street PIGS. ITS A SHAM. Remember: They are filthy rich EVEN AFTER their tax deductable contributions. Greedy pigs. Now, we are headed for the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time. SEND A “THANK YOU†NOTE TO YOUR FAVORITE MILLIONAIRE. ITS THEIR FAULT. I’m not discounting other factors like China, sub-prime, or gas prices. But all of those factors combined still pale in comparison to that HUGE transfer of wealth to the rich. Anyway, those other factors are all related and further aggrivated because of GREED. If it weren’t for the OBSCENE distribution of wealth within our country, there never would have been such a market for sub-prime to begin with. Which by the way, was another trick whipped up by greedy bankers and executives. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. The credit industry has been ENDORSED by people like Oprah, Ellen, Dr Phil, and many other celebrities. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. So don’t fall for their ‘humanitarian’ BS. ITS A SHAM. NOTHING BUT TAX DEDUCTABLE PR CRAP. Bottom line: The richest 1% will soon tank the largest economy in the world. It will be like nothing we’ve ever seen before. and thats just the beginning. Greed will eventually tank every major economy in the world. Causing millions to suffer and die. Oprah, Angelina, Brad, Bono, and Bill are not part of the solution. They are part of the problem. EXTREME WEALTH HAS MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. WITHOUT WORLD PROSPERITY, THERE WILL NEVER BE WORLD PEACE OR ANYTHING EVEN CLOSE. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL. Of course, the rich will throw a fit and call me a madman. Of course, their ignorant fans will do the same. You have to expect that. But I speak the truth. If you don’t believe me, then copy this entry and run it by any professor of economics or socio-economics. Then tell a friend. Call the local radio station. Re-post this entry or put it in your own words. Be one of the first to predict the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time and explain its cause. WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE.
grannytranny
February-26-2008 @ 6:57 pm
Nobody is gonna read that.
What are those things on her feet?
joycat
February-26-2008 @ 7:39 pm
^^ Looks like she’s ballerina point shoes.
joycat
February-26-2008 @ 8:05 pm
That should be: looks like she’s wearing ballerina point shoes.
Hannah Winter
February-26-2008 @ 8:23 pm
effing flawless!! Madonna is soo jealous right now.
Anonymous
February-27-2008 @ 6:38 am
Interesting photo. Those are “fetish” ballerina point shoes. Impossible to walk in.
they look like normal flats you would walk in and that she’s just pointed her feet in the ballerina position. i dont think you could actually dance in those.
ps this is a great fashion shot. love her!
Anonymous
February-27-2008 @ 10:34 am
Again, they are “fetish” point shoes. She’s holding onto the heels. You can’t walk in them so how on earth could you dance in them?
p
February-27-2008 @ 9:22 pm
I think you have to give props to the people who made this image, whether you like it or not, it’s an interesting photo. I definitely think this will get consumers to open the magazine to see what the editorial spread would look like.
vannesa
February-27-2008 @ 11:45 pm
I LOVE ITTTTTTTT, I love GWEN, why are people so dumb she does not look photoshoped you can hella tell it looks like her, come one she is different and cool, and is my god, like really, but people its high fashion!!!!
Jealous
February-28-2008 @ 9:30 am
This is SUCH a Madonna rip off!! The fettish shoues, the buns..except Madonna actually is into fettish and is a dancer. WTF?!
Ginger Fouteley
March-2-2008 @ 2:49 pm
SHE IS SOO UGLE !! :0
Anonymous
November-2-2009 @ 11:52 am
The charity ‘Raising Malawi’ (PR firm) founded by Madonna AND TWO OTHERS in ‘06′ held fund raisers for over two years before finally getting registered as a non-profit. In other words, Madonna and the others were free to squander that funding any way they saw fit for those first two years. In fact, they still havn’t accounted for the 3.7 million raised from a single event in the fall of ‘07′ (The grand opening of a Gucci flagship store in Manhattan.). She also pleaded with her fans worldwide for donations along the way. In the meantime, she toured the world to promote her latest CD and raked in another $280,000,000 gross in just over 12 months. To date, the basic financial info for ‘Raising Malawi’ still hasn’t been posted on the website or anywhere else. The ‘progress’ page only tells of the collective works by over 20 seperate charities. Each of which have their own sources of funding and may have recieved some sort of promotion or support from ‘Raising Malawi’ in order to be considered ‘partners’. But no indication is made how much of their funding came from ‘Raising Malawi’ or how much of their progress if any could be directly attributed to ‘Raising Malawi’. The fans/donors have no clue how many millions of dollars were raised in that first two years, no clue how much Madonna herself chipped in, and no clue how the money was spent before they finally registered as a non-profit. No clue what fraction of funding or works listed on that ‘progress’ page could be directly attributed to ‘Raising Malawi’. Nothing to go on but the vague and misleading word of Madonna. For example: She states in her latest promotional video that she will match any contributions made to her charity (PR firm) “dollar for dollar”. However, there is a disclaimer posted on the website for ‘Raising Malawi’ that Madonna’s total contribution will not exceed $100,000. Thats not per donation. Thats a maximum of $100,000 TOTAL. Less than a single days pay for Madonna. Also much less then she will surely rake in by promoting her own CDs, DVDs, and ‘for profit’ merchandise through this massive worldwide publicity stunt. So I called the office of ‘Raising Malawi’ in an attempt to verify some sort of efficient financial operation (310) 867-2881 or (888) 72-DONOR). These details are ALWAYS made available by legitimate charities. But not in this case. I got nothing but recorded messages and hangups. So I did some research on my own. ‘Raising Malawi’ still hasn’t been given any kind of rating by ANY independent charity watchdog like Charitywatch.org. The vast overwhelming majority of ‘celebrity’ foundations never are. In general, they are inneficient and riddled with corruption. Like the promotion of CDs, world tours, commercial websites, entire lines of jewelry (not just the single piece from which proceeds are donated), and high end retail flagship stores. Its far less expensive to promote your image and product with a contribution to your own charity (PR firm) than it is to buy commercial airtime worldwide. This is why its become such a trend. Celebrity foundations are also notorious for squandering much of their funding on private jet rides and super high end accomodations for their managers, PR crews, and celebrity figure heads. Its legal even for a nonprofit but not noble or efficient by any stretch of the imagination. In fact, non-profits are not actually required by law to be efficient. This is why the independent rating is so important. In general, ‘celebrity’ foundations never even get one. They are a twisted inefficient mutant of charity, self-promotion, exotic travel, and PR crap. Still, they compete for funding with more efficient legitimate charities. The celebrity figure heads often disregard the primary donors, co-founders, and managers, take personal credit for any collective work done, and seek maximum publicity shortly before or after the release of their own commercial projects. Its a sham. So if its not rated, then don’t support it. Instead, support a top rated charity like any of those given high ratings at Charitywatch.org.
34 Comments
freak
Um, WTF? OVER?!?!
And nobody cares Gavin is just on your gravy train until his career takes off.
looks like a marc jacobs ad
Amazing! Looks Stunning!
love it. looks like a fashion ad.
whats stunning that 40yr old woman dressed like a 5yr old.
Boooo, not my favorite look for her.
SO FUCKEN H O T
What a great cover!! Love it!!
Shes still BEAUTIFUL when shes pouting and looking pissed off, can she ever look bad? I dont think so….
Might be ok if it weren’t for the red eyes. It makes her look either really tired or stoned…and it’s not easy to make Gwen look bad.
A good job in photoshopping her chin.
are those nylon toe slips she’s wearing? and is that a paper plane on her head? god these fashion phonies must think we’re all idiots.
Zoolander would be so proud.
amazing! finally, something artsy and interesting to look at.
Finally, a look of hers I can get behind - LOVE IT!!!
Looks like a younger but by no means hotter version of Vivienne Westwood. HOT. I like this.
The cover is certainly cool but I don’t see how anyone could really think she looks beautiful in this shot. It’s quite scary looking I think. I like this whole look for her better though, reminds me of her back in her No Doubt days of crazy hair and makeup.
I don’t really like her, but the cover is okay. Interesting.
Hate the makeup, hate the hair (WTF–is that a paper airplane in her hair?), especially the color. Gwen looks positively dreadful here. This is not a flattering photo shoot by any means.
But for some reason, I’m not hating the dress. I might even like that multicolored harlequin print…
Don’t believe one optimistic word from any public figure about the economy or humanity in general. They are all part of the problem. Its like a game of Monopoly. In America, the richest 1% now hold 1/2 OF ALL UNITED STATES WEALTH. Unlike ‘lesser’ estimates, this includes all stocks, bonds, cash, and material assets held by America’s richest 1%. Even that filthy pig Oprah acknowledged that it was at about 50% in 2006. Naturally, she put her own ‘humanitarian’ spin on it. Calling attention to her own ‘good will’. WHAT A DISGUSTING HYPOCRITE SLOB. THE RICHEST 1% HAVE LITERALLY MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. Don’t fall for all of their ‘humanitarian’ CRAP. ITS A SHAM. THESE PEOPLE ARE CAUSING THE SAME PROBLEMS THEY PRETEND TO CARE ABOUT. Ask any professor of economics. Money does not grow on trees. The government can’t just print up more on a whim. At any given time, there is a relative limit to the wealth within ANY economy of ANY size. So when too much wealth accumulates at the top, the middle class slip further into debt and the lower class further into poverty. A similar rule applies worldwide. The world’s richest 1% now own over 40% of ALL WORLD WEALTH. This is EVEN AFTER you account for all of this ‘good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS from celebrities and executives. ITS A SHAM. As they get richer and richer, less wealth is left circulating beneath them. This is the single greatest underlying cause for the current US recession. The middle class can no longer afford to sustain their share of the economy. Their wealth has been gradually transfered to the richest 1%. One way or another, we suffer because of their incredible greed. We are talking about TRILLIONS of dollars. Transfered FROM US TO THEM. Over a period of about 27 years. Thats Reaganomics for you. The wealth does not ‘trickle down’ as we were told it would. It just accumulates at the top. Shrinking the middle class and expanding the lower class. Causing a domino effect of socio-economic problems. But the rich will never stop. They will never settle for a reasonable share of ANYTHING. They will do whatever it takes to get even richer. Leaving even less of the pie for the other 99% of us to share. At the same time, they throw back a few tax deductable crumbs and call themselves ‘humanitarians’. IT CAN’T WORK THIS WAY. This is going to end just like a game of Monopoly. The current US recession will drag on for years and lead into the worst US depression of all time. The richest 1% will live like royalty while the rest of us fight over jobs, food, and gasoline. Crime, poverty, and suicide will skyrocket. So don’t fall for all of this PR CRAP from Hollywood, Pro Sports, and Wall Street PIGS. ITS A SHAM. Remember: They are filthy rich EVEN AFTER their tax deductable contributions. Greedy pigs. Now, we are headed for the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time. SEND A “THANK YOU†NOTE TO YOUR FAVORITE MILLIONAIRE. ITS THEIR FAULT. I’m not discounting other factors like China, sub-prime, or gas prices. But all of those factors combined still pale in comparison to that HUGE transfer of wealth to the rich. Anyway, those other factors are all related and further aggrivated because of GREED. If it weren’t for the OBSCENE distribution of wealth within our country, there never would have been such a market for sub-prime to begin with. Which by the way, was another trick whipped up by greedy bankers and executives. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. The credit industry has been ENDORSED by people like Oprah, Ellen, Dr Phil, and many other celebrities. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. So don’t fall for their ‘humanitarian’ BS. ITS A SHAM. NOTHING BUT TAX DEDUCTABLE PR CRAP. Bottom line: The richest 1% will soon tank the largest economy in the world. It will be like nothing we’ve ever seen before. and thats just the beginning. Greed will eventually tank every major economy in the world. Causing millions to suffer and die. Oprah, Angelina, Brad, Bono, and Bill are not part of the solution. They are part of the problem. EXTREME WEALTH HAS MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. WITHOUT WORLD PROSPERITY, THERE WILL NEVER BE WORLD PEACE OR ANYTHING EVEN CLOSE. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL. Of course, the rich will throw a fit and call me a madman. Of course, their ignorant fans will do the same. You have to expect that. But I speak the truth. If you don’t believe me, then copy this entry and run it by any professor of economics or socio-economics. Then tell a friend. Call the local radio station. Re-post this entry or put it in your own words. Be one of the first to predict the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time and explain its cause. WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE.
Nobody is gonna read that.
What are those things on her feet?
^^ Looks like she’s ballerina point shoes.
That should be: looks like she’s wearing ballerina point shoes.
effing flawless!! Madonna is soo jealous right now.
Interesting photo. Those are “fetish” ballerina point shoes. Impossible to walk in.
they look like normal flats you would walk in and that she’s just pointed her feet in the ballerina position. i dont think you could actually dance in those.
ps this is a great fashion shot. love her!
Again, they are “fetish” point shoes. She’s holding onto the heels. You can’t walk in them so how on earth could you dance in them?
I think you have to give props to the people who made this image, whether you like it or not, it’s an interesting photo. I definitely think this will get consumers to open the magazine to see what the editorial spread would look like.
I LOVE ITTTTTTTT, I love GWEN, why are people so dumb she does not look photoshoped you can hella tell it looks like her, come one she is different and cool, and is my god, like really, but people its high fashion!!!!
This is SUCH a Madonna rip off!! The fettish shoues, the buns..except Madonna actually is into fettish and is a dancer. WTF?!
SHE IS SOO UGLE !! :0
The charity ‘Raising Malawi’ (PR firm) founded by Madonna AND TWO OTHERS in ‘06′ held fund raisers for over two years before finally getting registered as a non-profit. In other words, Madonna and the others were free to squander that funding any way they saw fit for those first two years. In fact, they still havn’t accounted for the 3.7 million raised from a single event in the fall of ‘07′ (The grand opening of a Gucci flagship store in Manhattan.). She also pleaded with her fans worldwide for donations along the way. In the meantime, she toured the world to promote her latest CD and raked in another $280,000,000 gross in just over 12 months. To date, the basic financial info for ‘Raising Malawi’ still hasn’t been posted on the website or anywhere else. The ‘progress’ page only tells of the collective works by over 20 seperate charities. Each of which have their own sources of funding and may have recieved some sort of promotion or support from ‘Raising Malawi’ in order to be considered ‘partners’. But no indication is made how much of their funding came from ‘Raising Malawi’ or how much of their progress if any could be directly attributed to ‘Raising Malawi’. The fans/donors have no clue how many millions of dollars were raised in that first two years, no clue how much Madonna herself chipped in, and no clue how the money was spent before they finally registered as a non-profit. No clue what fraction of funding or works listed on that ‘progress’ page could be directly attributed to ‘Raising Malawi’. Nothing to go on but the vague and misleading word of Madonna. For example: She states in her latest promotional video that she will match any contributions made to her charity (PR firm) “dollar for dollar”. However, there is a disclaimer posted on the website for ‘Raising Malawi’ that Madonna’s total contribution will not exceed $100,000. Thats not per donation. Thats a maximum of $100,000 TOTAL. Less than a single days pay for Madonna. Also much less then she will surely rake in by promoting her own CDs, DVDs, and ‘for profit’ merchandise through this massive worldwide publicity stunt. So I called the office of ‘Raising Malawi’ in an attempt to verify some sort of efficient financial operation (310) 867-2881 or (888) 72-DONOR). These details are ALWAYS made available by legitimate charities. But not in this case. I got nothing but recorded messages and hangups. So I did some research on my own. ‘Raising Malawi’ still hasn’t been given any kind of rating by ANY independent charity watchdog like Charitywatch.org. The vast overwhelming majority of ‘celebrity’ foundations never are. In general, they are inneficient and riddled with corruption. Like the promotion of CDs, world tours, commercial websites, entire lines of jewelry (not just the single piece from which proceeds are donated), and high end retail flagship stores. Its far less expensive to promote your image and product with a contribution to your own charity (PR firm) than it is to buy commercial airtime worldwide. This is why its become such a trend. Celebrity foundations are also notorious for squandering much of their funding on private jet rides and super high end accomodations for their managers, PR crews, and celebrity figure heads. Its legal even for a nonprofit but not noble or efficient by any stretch of the imagination. In fact, non-profits are not actually required by law to be efficient. This is why the independent rating is so important. In general, ‘celebrity’ foundations never even get one. They are a twisted inefficient mutant of charity, self-promotion, exotic travel, and PR crap. Still, they compete for funding with more efficient legitimate charities. The celebrity figure heads often disregard the primary donors, co-founders, and managers, take personal credit for any collective work done, and seek maximum publicity shortly before or after the release of their own commercial projects. Its a sham. So if its not rated, then don’t support it. Instead, support a top rated charity like any of those given high ratings at Charitywatch.org.
One Trackback
[...] VÃa | Faded youth [...]