BRITNEY SPEARS IS BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH
Posted Thursday, February 21st, 2008 at 11:55 am
Filed under: Britney Spears
Check out a photo creation by ageprogression.org which shows how Britney Spears could look if she continues a party lifestyle.
This is her aged 20 years. The images were created by one of the world’s leading forensic age-progression artists based on the pop singer carrying on her currently destructive lifestyle. The same sophisticated computer techniques were used as those that are employed to help the FBI determine how time may have changed the appearance of fugitives and missing persons. The photographs show the effects of hard partying, wich inude weight gain, enlarged pores, thinning hair, sagging skin, and damaged blood vessels.
Our thoughts?
February 21st, 2008 at 11:58 am
Come on!!! This is unnecessary!! Some people just have way too much time on their hands. Go do something that really matters!!
February 21st, 2008 at 12:03 pm
With the horrible hariweaves, the drug induced acne, the out of shape body, Britney doesn’t look all that much better now than these pics. If she keeps up her lunatic lifestyle she will look much worse than this.
February 21st, 2008 at 12:03 pm
“Go do something that really matters!!”
What, like replying to a celebrity-obsessive blog? Don’t be such a hypocrite, spinner.
February 21st, 2008 at 12:06 pm
awesome.
February 21st, 2008 at 12:14 pm
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD…PLEEEAASE dont let this happen! I’m praying…
February 21st, 2008 at 12:16 pm
AHAHAH… Spinner u dumb dicksucker.. U just got owned!!!
February 21st, 2008 at 12:21 pm
Apart from the weight gain in these photos, she resembles most 40 year olds that never used drugs/alcohol/cigarettes. The reality is that aging happens!!
February 21st, 2008 at 12:26 pm
I doubt these photos. Where are the wrinkles? How true can they be when they don’t even show what wrinkles would be on a normal woman in their 40’s? Those pictures just look like overweight women in middle age.
February 21st, 2008 at 12:44 pm
at least she looks happy! haha.
seriously, this look mega-cheap. what’s with the purple eye sockets? i’ve never seen a human look like that.
February 21st, 2008 at 12:45 pm
This will only happen if girlfriend loses all her money… otherwise.. Gastro bypass, facial peels, botox and hair weaves will fix all of this.. just like it does for so many other celebs who would look like SHIT if they didn’t have the money and time to look otherwise.
And Spinner.. I get it… this company that does this should be focusing their time and energy on real missing people and fugitives.. not trashing Britney Spears.. it’s a little much.
February 21st, 2008 at 12:45 pm
which one is the “after” picture?
February 21st, 2008 at 12:48 pm
party lifestyle?What partylifestyle?!People needs to fuck off
February 21st, 2008 at 1:05 pm
^Thanks Only 1…nice to know someone understood my point.
February 21st, 2008 at 1:09 pm
LOL PSL — so sweat Spinner
February 21st, 2008 at 1:14 pm
^^ i meant “no sweat”
February 21st, 2008 at 1:15 pm
[...] D*ana wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptbritney-spears-in-the-future.jpg. Check out a photo creation by ageprogression.org which shows how Britney Spears could look if she continues a party lifestyle. This is her aged 20 years. The images were created by one of the world’s … [...]
February 21st, 2008 at 1:20 pm
brtney would never dress that conservative…even in her 40s. LETS GET SERIOUS NOW.
February 21st, 2008 at 1:24 pm
what ONLY1 said is exactly what i was going to say. this is what would happen to somebody living that lifestyle without the money. otherwise, nope.
February 21st, 2008 at 1:29 pm
Doesn’t even resemble her at all. Come on. This is stupid.
February 21st, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Okay, who is that???? Doesn’t look like her one bit. Can we get one of Lindsay???
February 21st, 2008 at 2:27 pm
That’s just plain mean. I’m 42 and I don’t look anything like that and I had a pretty wild past.
February 21st, 2008 at 3:28 pm
Huh? I don’t get this at all. Both pics look bad to me. Is one supposed to be worse than the other?
February 21st, 2008 at 6:17 pm
Some of you people have very peculiar ideas of what a “normal woman” in her 40s is supposed to look like. Are you still in middle school, or what?
February 21st, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Well, she will look like that. Or ever worse. I am not surprised.
February 21st, 2008 at 6:46 pm
Oh god…I hope she never winds up like this. I can’t actually imagine her ever getting to this stage though…I think she would have settled down before it got to this. So many people go through crazy times in their life and get through it. Look at Mick Jagger for example…his younger years were full of booze and drugs etc etc and he doesn’t look too bad considering.
February 21st, 2008 at 7:37 pm
Wait a minute….I thought that was a recent picture of her…..
February 21st, 2008 at 10:46 pm
They forgot the missing teeth!
February 21st, 2008 at 11:41 pm
they’re not taking plastic surgery that we all know will take place into consideration….LOTS of plastic surgery
February 22nd, 2008 at 5:37 am
No wonder they could never find their arse with their both hands never mind the missing person !
February 22nd, 2008 at 9:07 am
sick.
February 23rd, 2008 at 10:30 pm
Actually, this lady looks better than Shitney.
February 24th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
wow, now come on…I am not a Brit fan, and never was but homegirl has alrdy lost it, why must me waste our time finding enjoyment in her misery. We need to get back to what is really important–the war in Iraq, genocide, and the crumbling US government