DREW BARRYMORE DOES ‘VOGUE’

drewxlarge-vogue.jpg

“I think I had some mechanism in my head that said, ‘If you don’t pull it together for yourself, no one else will.’ That’s coming from a person who had to try it all … and who still loves to have a good time. I do believe in ‘Work hard, play hard,’ but ‘Work hard’ always comes first, and it did even when I was wild and young.”

Drew Barrymore offers her take on being young and in Hollywood in the March issue of Vogue magazine

[Photo Credit: Steven Meisel]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

25 Comments

  1. Ouch!
    February-18-2008 @ 9:01 pm

    Is that a cover from the ’80s?!?! :goes vomit:

  2. supernova
    February-18-2008 @ 9:04 pm

    nice

  3. parissucksliterally
    February-18-2008 @ 9:04 pm

    she looks very “mature”.

  4. Ivy
    February-18-2008 @ 9:05 pm

    aww sooo pretty…sooo photoshopped…

  5. supernova
    February-18-2008 @ 9:21 pm

    ^^I think that’s the point folks. The cover is SUPPOSED TO BE A THROWBACK!! Duh.

  6. MikeC...
    February-18-2008 @ 9:21 pm

    Magazine covers have zero credibility—Photoshop can make dog shit look good……

  7. Stephi
    February-18-2008 @ 9:26 pm

    Yes the cover is meant to look 80s. I think Drew looks gorgeous in this shot, photoshop or not. I don’t know if I would have recognised her had it not been for the title. Her eyes and nose look totally different to me for some reason…I just think she doesn’t normally take sexy looking pictures like this. She’s usually laughing or smiling.

  8. Ouch!
    February-18-2008 @ 9:52 pm

    Yeah, the fact that is supposed to be a throwback to the ’80s is just WRONG.

  9. marina
    February-18-2008 @ 10:45 pm

    I don’t have a problem with 80s…I like the cover , she was photoshopped , of course but who doesn’t ?

  10. Anonymous
    February-18-2008 @ 10:48 pm

    BORING!!!

  11. Prudie
    February-18-2008 @ 11:14 pm

    so slim WOW! an inspiration for me.

  12. Miss
    February-19-2008 @ 4:44 am

    nice picture but come on that’s not what Drew looks like!

  13. supernova
    February-19-2008 @ 5:59 am

    ^wow, some of you just don’t get it. They didn’t want the cover to look how she usually does. The whole point is for it to be an artist’s depiction (the photographer) of a different era and of a woman who is VERY different from the 35 year old California girl drew is. IT’S THE WHOLE POINT OF A PHOTOGRAPHER AND EDITOR CREATING A LOOK. To show the person in a completely different way (like looking at piece of art from a different angle makes you see it in a whole new way).

  14. l
    February-19-2008 @ 6:01 am

    I find it offensive and annoying that they must take every bit of somebodys unquie beauty, airbrush the shit out of it,so to creat yet another generic looking cover/advert/whatever.
    Shes beautiful on the inside and out.

  15. yeahso?
    February-19-2008 @ 6:44 am

    wow. they ’shopped about twenty pounds off of her. her arms aren’t that skinny and in now way do i think drew is fat

  16. Meg
    February-19-2008 @ 7:40 am

    photoshop! her arms look demented

  17. Divina
    February-19-2008 @ 8:04 am

    Me no like-y. It does not even look like her.

  18. audrey
    February-19-2008 @ 8:05 am

    Why use someone famous for a cover if you are going to photo shop them to look like every other generic model on any other cover? If it isn’t that then they make the star look like some futuristic fem bot? What the heck is wrong with leaving someone like Drew looking –well like Drew?

  19. supernova
    February-19-2008 @ 8:31 am

    ^The problem with not photoshoping is that all of you on here bitching about too much photoshoping ARE BUYING THE VERY FUCKING MAGAZINES THAT PHOTOSHOP!! If you’ve bought ANY magazine publication related to fashion, beauty or celebrity of ANY kind, then YOU’RE the reason they keep doing it. Because if Drew Barrymore was on the cover with her sagging tits and wide ass, with zits on her face and the beginning aging lines that appears on a womans face in her 30s YOU’D ALL BITCH THAT SHE LOOKED LIKE SHIT. The average person doesn’t want to look at a magazine cover and see their next door neighbor - they want to see a glamour goddess who they can aspire too. When was the last time you looked at a makeup ad and saw a fat ugly woman in the photo. Stop being so fucking hypocritical. They sell photoshopped images because you all BUY INTO IT.

  20. No One You Know
    February-19-2008 @ 8:44 am

    I agree with Supernova :)
    I dont buy that junk. I come here. :P

  21. mindy
    February-19-2008 @ 8:53 am

    She looks beautiful there. Like a classic beauty.
    Supernova is right, every magazine is photoshopped these days (and have been for years!). Hell, I bet even the animal magazine covers are photoshopped LOL.

  22. supernova
    February-19-2008 @ 8:53 am

    ^LoL. Yeah, it’s more fun to crack jokes on the photos here!

  23. ana
    February-19-2008 @ 8:54 am

    weird eyebrows

  24. Anonymous
    February-19-2008 @ 9:27 am

    Normally she’s cute as a button but here she looks like Fishstick, especially the eyes.

  25. Ivy
    February-19-2008 @ 11:06 am

    Thank you for informing us all that photoshopping is the norm now, DUH of course we knew that already!!!!!
    …..i think what people are “bitching” about is photoshopping someone beyond recognition

2 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Madame Tussaud’s unveiled their wax figures in London today, and strangely enough, Drew’s looks more lifelike than her recent Vogue cover. [...]

  2. By Faded Youth Blog » Blog Archive » DATE NIGHT on February 20, 2008 at 9:32 am

    [...] happy twosome, who have been dating for nearly 6 months, appear to be headed for commitmentland. When asked about her beau in the new issue of Vogue, Drew gushed: “Can you feel my smiling? My cheeks [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared.

Want your image to show up? Get a gravatar, it's easy.