RUMER SHOPS UNTIL SHE DROPS

rumer-prepares-for-golden-globes.jpg

Rumer Willis is taking her gig as Miss Golden Globes very seriously. Perhaps too seriously.

The 20-year-old celebuspawn of Demi Moore and Bruce Willis spent nearly four hours trying on outfit after outfit during a shopping trip in LA’s trendy Ventura Boulevard.

Rumer loved getting her pics snapped as she tried on a shorts and top combo in duck egg blue satin and then threw on a more grown-up oyster-hued silk number.

Although she left the store laden with bags, it’s not known whether or not her choice for the glitzy film ceremony was among them.

You’ll just have to tune in on January 13 to find out!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

51 Comments

  1. Anonymous
    January-4-2008 @ 6:12 pm

    Rumer, Nothing is going me you look like a STAR! There is nothing wrong with that so please stop trying it is just not working.

  2. supernova
    January-4-2008 @ 6:15 pm

    I think the long hair helps (but not a lot). Now if only she’d wash and comb it that greasy tangled mess.

  3. Tropico
    January-4-2008 @ 6:16 pm

    Hopefully by not boycotting the show she’ll be black listed and we’ll never have to see her potato head again!

  4. Gypsytrill
    January-4-2008 @ 6:17 pm

    Too bad nobody will be watching the show, because the writers are all on strike………..

  5. Sarah
    January-4-2008 @ 6:17 pm

    She looks like an ugly Bruce Willis!!!! Masculine face!!!

  6. datgirl
    January-4-2008 @ 6:17 pm

    Well no one is going to see her at the Golden Globes, b/c no actor is showing up, they are not crossing the picket lines.

  7. Anonymous
    January-4-2008 @ 6:33 pm

    Breathtaking!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  8. Aysla
    January-4-2008 @ 6:36 pm

    I don’t think the hair helps. There’s nothing that can hide that level of fug. I know that’s mean, but damn…

  9. crumbly
    January-4-2008 @ 6:43 pm

    she looks more like the offspring of Jay Leno…maybe Demi got busy late-night style.

  10. boohoo
    January-4-2008 @ 6:55 pm

    That’s some big feet!

  11. supernova
    January-4-2008 @ 7:02 pm

    Oh, please. If it weren’t for that long weave, her head would take up the entire space of the photograph. Thank god for weaves.

  12. parissucksliterally
    January-4-2008 @ 7:10 pm

    I think it is hilarious that the year she gets Miss Golden Globe, no one attending or watching.

  13. THE DEVIL
    January-4-2008 @ 7:10 pm

    let’s support the writers! power to the creative class!

  14. Stephi
    January-4-2008 @ 7:27 pm

    Oh god. Could she look any grosser? I don’t think the long hair helps at all, her weave is worse than Britney’s. It’s all ratty and oily looking and it really doesn’t do much to improve her face at all. I don’t know how the hell this girl thinks she is going to make it in Hollywood without the help of a surgeoun. Harsh as it may sound, its true.

  15. supernova
    January-4-2008 @ 8:06 pm

    Fuck the writers!! Bunch of fucking spoiled brats.

  16. Shell
    January-4-2008 @ 8:06 pm

    She has a very large head and ugly face.
    Boy am I nice. lol

  17. just askin'
    January-4-2008 @ 8:35 pm

    Well, I for one am happy to see her with longer hair–unkempt and greasy-looking as it may be.

    Ya’ll have GOT to admit it’s an improvement over the short black man-do she used to sport. Remember how she used to look? That longer hair distracts from the freakishness of her chin, and those bangs actually make her eyes look less teeny. And she looks so much closer to her real age.

    I do think the longer hair is a good step in the right direction. Now all she has to do is wash it and find someone to show her how to style it…

  18. shinystar
    January-4-2008 @ 9:06 pm

    supernova, why spoiled?

  19. saywhut
    January-4-2008 @ 11:30 pm

    Damn that girl loves attention. I don’t like her, but I must say the satin dress is really cute.

  20. eek
    January-4-2008 @ 11:49 pm

    i think shes like the uglier version of dita. both so tranny looking. ugh.

  21. miss
    January-4-2008 @ 11:50 pm

    that dress on the left is really pretty. as for her…well my grandmother always told me “if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all”.

  22. kim
    January-5-2008 @ 12:55 am

    she looks great. wow what a hottie

  23. MeSoup
    January-5-2008 @ 1:46 am

    Oh Wow…. So sexy. LOL> Would somebody tell me how you become a golden globe girl???? SHe’s so ugly, why did they picked her?

  24. Gorrion
    January-5-2008 @ 3:52 am

    All of you must be some of the most beautiful people in the world to say all that, don’t you?. Who do you think you are? Leave the girl live her life and do what she wants, she has a personality, do you know what is that?. She is a normal person, bit..es.

  25. Linsay
    January-5-2008 @ 5:46 am

    She is Hot! This dresses is no good: http://www.hotstuff.eu.tt/

  26. lovely and amazing
    January-5-2008 @ 7:11 am

    Rumer Willis is a child of celebrities who should live only as private citizen. Because there is absolutely nothing exceptional, attractive, or talented about her. But she is vain and ambitious with celebrity access so she would do well in a high profile regular person profession. She could be a real estate broker to the stars or something like a publicist. It’s literally sickening and an insult to aspiring talents everywhere for her being promoted and pushed on the public as a celebrity. Blatant shameless nepotism. Her parents are wrong for encouraing it and should tell her the truth.

  27. dana
    January-5-2008 @ 7:31 am

    Her bod’s not bad — but these are lousy choices with regard to color and cut.
    Get thee to a stylist.

  28. supernova
    January-5-2008 @ 7:37 am

    shinystar, I worked on tv shows for years in the writers room with the writers. Trust me when I say they are spoiled brats. Some are nice of course but they are ALL spoiled. They make a RIDICULOUS amount of money (the lowest paid writer on a tv show makes $10,000 per episode/week plus $22,000 per script they write - most people get to write two scripts per season) PLUS residuals PLUS unbelievable perks that you and most people will never get and STILL they bitch and moan. If they had to work every day like most people, they’d lay down and die.

  29. Anonymous
    January-5-2008 @ 7:54 am

    I worked on tv shows for years in the writers room with the writers

    What does that mean? Are you a writer too?

  30. Noticed
    January-5-2008 @ 8:59 am

    Michael K from D-Listed called her “Butterhead” LOL! It’s true–If you scroll so your screen cuts her off at the neck she does look good!

  31. Anonymous
    January-5-2008 @ 9:41 am

    “I worked on tv shows for years in the writers room with the writers
    What does that mean? Are you a writer too? ”

    I guess it means she was the one making the coffee.

  32. Anonymous
    January-5-2008 @ 10:23 am

    ^^^^LMAO true that!

  33. Anonymous
    January-5-2008 @ 11:04 am

    Who is this Dude???

  34. beckham lover
    January-5-2008 @ 11:13 am

    she is very unfortunate looking!

  35. supernova
    January-5-2008 @ 11:47 am

    Anonymous, thanks for showing your ignorance (it’s mighty and endless). As a Script Coordinator - I ran the script department and did notes and script continuity with the writers and directors which means everything pertaining to the script and the production of the script was handled through my department (including writer’s contracts). Since you’re clearly so fucking stupid about the entertainment industry, why don’t you just do a little research online and educate yourself about staffing tv shows before you open that garbage dump you call a mouth. And (just so that we all understand just what a pretentious fuck you are) what EXACTLY would be wrong with someone working as a goffer or production assistant and getting coffee? Sure, it’s not as glamorous as your mother’s lifetime career of selling her ass to truck drivers for a hit of crack, but it’s a respectable job.

  36. The Drunken Russian
    January-5-2008 @ 12:29 pm

    Oh my god…love the cream sating dress….who is the designer…where can I buy one! I love it!

  37. dana
    January-5-2008 @ 12:43 pm

    LOL Supernova,
    Great response — (especially loved the part about mother’s career). You should have skipped coordinating the scripts and been writing them. You have the gift of words…or at least of pithy retorts! LOL

  38. supernova
    January-5-2008 @ 12:48 pm

    ok, dana, right back at ya — love “pithy retorts”. You should start a blog called “Pithy Retorts”. I’d bookmark it. LoL.

  39. THE DEVIL
    January-5-2008 @ 1:19 pm

    Supernova:Wooooahhaha, chill dude…who cares what people think. Specially in this venues.

    With no other intentions that to inform my self, I wanna ask you,
    when you say “most people get to write two scripts per season”, that means…like…40.000 a year? the math in your comment pointed to very little $$$…. Are you also suggesting that te time they spend “writting” is not a full time “office” job, therefore they are not entitled to a full time pay?

  40. Anonymous
    January-5-2008 @ 2:14 pm

    You all are funny judging her before the final results. She’s only picking out dresses. Her hair hasn’t ben done and her make-up hasn’t been done and her dresses hasn’t been tailored. So before all that, you can’t really judge yet. You all are a bunch of mean nasty bitches on here.

  41. supernova
    January-5-2008 @ 2:15 pm

    THE DEVIL, (sorry if this is a long explanation - but you did ask) when I say $22,000 per script for a season on a sitcom that’s in addition to roughly $10,000 per episode (which is per week). A network will typically pickup a sitcom for a minimum of 13 episodes per season. That’s 130,000 plus 22,000 per script (given 2 scripts that’s 44,000). PLUS residuals every time that show repeats (think about how many repeats one show will get per year over the season and summer months — writers get at least half the original price of the script for EACH RERUN). Even if you’re on a show that is only picked up for 6 episodes, that would be $60,000 plus $22,000 (for one script) plus another $22,000 for the likelyhood of that episode airing twice in repeats that season. That would be $104,000 for two-three months worth of work for an ENTRY LEVEL JUNIOR WRITER (the lowest on the pole). Again, this is for sitcoms — for dramas like Grey’s Anatomy get almost DOUBLE that amount because they are hour-long). As far as the work they do — these shows are staffed with WAY more writers than they need (they actually sit in a room together and write and rewrite the script together). Case in point: Jay Leno has 19 writers on his staff. He wrote his own monologue and performed his show seemlessly and satisfactorily on Wednesday. I ask you, why would you need 19 writers to do what one man has done? It’s an extremely flawed system. The work they do is no harder than what the average person does working at a company and doing overtime to make ends meet (and, actually, it’s a lot easier). Keep in mind that when a series goes into syndication they get paid a crapload of money for those reruns (that’s the lotto ticket for them). I’ve done tons of contracts for these guys and have had to deal with the WGA and the studios and agents on this. Don’t believe the crap - writers are paid EXTRAORDINARILY well (which is why most people would kill to do the job).

  42. supernova
    January-5-2008 @ 2:18 pm

    ^correction: Hollywood writers are paid extraordinarily well (novelists and journalists don’t even come close in salary).

  43. THE DEVIL
    January-5-2008 @ 2:36 pm

    your argument sound good enough to say that they’re spoiled…
    But why do they “dare” to protest then…that seems to be putting the spot light in such a “flawed system”…
    I still feel there is more in this picture.

  44. anonymous
    January-5-2008 @ 3:39 pm

    maybe you should be asking what studio executives make. all they do is exploit people with actual entertainment talent, and take most of the money while others do all the actual production.

    also, keep in mind that 90% of the writers working in hollywood aren’t working for hit shows like The Office, or 24, or Heroes. That’s like saying all basketball players in the NBA have $50 million contracts.

    Try going to http://www.unitedhollywood.com to find out what the real issues are. it’s not making $1 million vs. making $1.1 million, it’s more along the lines of writers not getting paid residuals for content delivered over the internet via iTunes or ad-supported streaming, and also whether reality show or animation writers should be covered by the WGA. Have you ever wondered why more and more crappy reality TV shows have been cropping up on TV in the last 6 years? It’s because the studios don’t have to treat reality show writers are covered by the WGA, and they know they can treat them like crap, giving them low salaries and no benefits, and reality writers won’t strike. .

    don’t think writers are being greedy, it is extremely hard to get any kind of creative job in hollywood because it’s such a risky business. the ones that actually succeed have to be really good, and even then they still don’t get paid nearly as much as big name actors or studio executives.

  45. supernova
    January-5-2008 @ 4:09 pm

    ^anonymous, we clearly disagree (which is fine) but the reason only 90% of hollywood aren’t working for a hit is exactly the reason 90% of Americans isn’t wealthy — it’s statistically impossible for everyone to be at the top. My point is that the reason the 90% are able to survive is because they live on residuals for most of the year while the write spec scripts that will never be produced (in other words, it’s a primadonna lifestyle when you can afford to sit back and collect money on past work as oppossed to having to work every day like the rest of America). I go to unitedhollywood.com all the time (and deadlinehollywood.com). I know exactly what the issues are and, while I don’t disagree that people should be paid accordingly for their efforts, I disagree wholeheartedly that the writers feel they are entitled to place a decrepid financially burdensome business model on new media (residuals are a rediculous, outdated proposition).

    Reality tv has flourished because of the demand for it by the public because sitcoms were so awful they became intolerable. But the networks aren’t exactly happy about scripted tv dying (even though they contributed to its death) because they can’t make money off of it in syndication (syndication is the big money in tv - not first-run shows). So, no, the studios are not conspiring to keep writers out using reality tv because they’re losing BIG time under that tent. As far as comparing the salaries of writers to actors, you definately lose me there too because these idiot actors being paid tens of millions of dollars per feature film is what is crippling the industry as a whole. The writers and producers will come to an agreement for sure at some point but I think it’s going to be several months before they do.

  46. anonymous
    January-5-2008 @ 4:25 pm

    Lol, I totally agree with you that it’s going to be several months before there is an agreement. This whole dispute is just crazy. I mean, no one wins really.

  47. supernova
    January-5-2008 @ 4:30 pm

    ^I know. I just spoke with a friend in LA and he said it’s like the “last days” out there — people are hurting bad. A mess. And Ms. Rumor Willis may not get to wear her new dress to the golden globes afterall (what is the world coming too - LoL).

  48. anonymous
    January-5-2008 @ 4:48 pm

    Wow, that is bad. Is it just cause the two sides are that stubborn? What is the hold up? Anyway, I hope there will be some sort of agreement soon or were all screwed especially Ms. Rumor Willis. :-)

  49. THE DEVIL
    January-5-2008 @ 5:33 pm

    Interesting debate.
    I have to point to one of the arguments as questions:
    Are the writters expecting to get the same type of recognition that the actors have?
    Why do we support such “idiotic” compensations for actors or entartainers (sports included)?
    THAT is in my opinion the REAL issue that brings balances and fairness to the table.

  50. supernova
    January-5-2008 @ 6:51 pm

    ^LoL THE DEVIL (O’Reilly). I do think the writers want the same recognition as writers (they enjoy the fruits of awards season as much as actors) but there are huge egos on ALL sides of the table (writers and producers/studio execs) — kinda standard in Hollywood. As far as why we support such idiotic compensations for entertainers… that is the question of the century - clearly, our priorities are more than questionable (and when I say “our” I mean the country as a whole). Still, there’s a ray of light. I think the internet has been made into what it is by the average person who is sick of seeing people with tons of money lay claim to having “talent” and “expertise”. It levels the playing field. On the internet, the average jo-blo who may or may not be educated, rich or even beautiful can get a video camera, post it online and BAM - instant celeb and it only costs a few buck. Go figure.

  51. EAT IT
    January-5-2008 @ 10:46 pm

    wow, i haven’t read the rumer post because…. well, i had nothing nice to say.
    BUT, i was curious on why so many comments and loved reading your discussion about the writers and stuff. very interesting perspectives. thanks for that.

One Trackback

  1. By Busy Bee Blogger - What’s the Buzz on January 5, 2008 at 9:25 am

    [...] source [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared.

Want your image to show up? Get a gravatar, it's easy.