Old married couple Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban are snapped kicking off the new year by going to lunch at Jones The Grocer in Woollahra, Sydney on Wednesday.
Nicole and her country crooner hubby have been the focus of some serious pregnancy rumours in recent weeks. The Daily Mail even went as far as to confirm the story, quoting the Australian actress as saying, “I just want to spend as much time as possible with my husband.”
Reps for Kidman quickly quelled gossip by releasing a simple but brief statement reading: “It is incorrect…she must have had about 30 babies by now. As far as we’re concerned, it’s another rumor out of London.”
End of story, right? Wrong! A funny little Blind Item came courtesy of the New York Post this morning. Check it before you wreck it:
Which 40ish actress has finally gotten pregnant for the first time? Her rep is denying it because she’s only a month into it, and has suffered miscarriages in the past. Said our source: “Watch for her to get bangs and start wearing hats to hide her sagging face because you can’t be on Botox when you are pregnant.”
Juicy, we know!
So, what’s the verdict? Is Nicole really knocked up? That would certainly explain the maternity wear!!
22 Comments
If she is only a month pregnant, that would NOT explain the bumpage!
well, time will tell……when she can move her face, it will be obvious.
It appears that she is, but these things are so easy to miscalculate. I hope these two make it.
Pictures don’t work.
Fix your pictures.
Time will tell and I hope she is! But in this picture it could just be the dress….it’s summer in Sydney and she just has on a sun dress!
how can she be pregnant for the first time if she has already had miscarriages? these people are idiots.
who gives a damn?
the first place you’ll see it is in her boobs…
she isn’t so get over it.
You have already made a fool of yourself by announcing she was now let it go
The pictures never work here, it’s BULLSHIT! Between the pictures not working AND the annoying pop-ups- AND you trying to be Perez Piggy Hilton- this place has really gone to the TOILET. Thanks for the memories.
Umm, how is she pregnant for the first time if she has had miscarriages in the past? Semantics, anyone?
It’s the dress. There’s a photo somewhere of her wearing this same dress in a bar in Bowen Australia back in May. She’s starting a new movie in a few weeks in Germany. They’ll be nude sex scenes (it is a Nicole Kidman movie after all). Read the first 80 pages of The Reader and you’ll know what I mean. I would imagine a baby bump would be difficult to hide in that “situation”. But if she is pregnant, with her history, it’d be pretty irresponsible of her to be doing a lot of flying & traveling.
Vee, that’s exactly what I was thinking too. How the hell can she be first time pregnant if she already miscarried Tommy’s baby (supposedly) before?
Time will tell.
The pictures work fine for me and I don’t any pop-up’s.
^^^ woops I can’t even write properly…. I meant to say “I don’t GET any pop-up’s”
If she isn’t pregnant, then she is getting FAT. Look at her boobs in that dress, they are bigger.
Wasn’t Tommy’s baby she miscarried either while she was married to him. She was cheating and had an abortion.
This is what I said earlier. Of course her rep is going to deny it consdiering her past miscarriages. I think she actually is pregnant this time around. She is looking so old in these pictures, her age is really catching up to her lately. No wonder she turns to the botox all the time.
Who cares? Check back later and we’ll know for sure. What is it lately declaring everyone pregnant then watching their stomachs? She either is or isn’t and time will tell. Her stomach will have to expand eventually and then we will know.
Weird blind item - I’d not even tell my publicist if I were only a month along in a pregnancy, if I’d suffered miscarriages in the past and didn’t want anyone to know about it. But I guess we’ll see if she starts rocking the bangs and can actually smile without looking like she’s in pain within the next few months.
If her chest is bigger, it’s because of the boob job…..Keith was tired thinking he was “bumpin’ uglies” with a boy…..She needs a baby like she needs another hole in the head…..She has two already that she doesn’t pay attention to now…..We’ve seen this “fugly” dress before…..Her movies suck, she sucks as an actress and her “paid help” can’t find his balls to leave……She ALWAYS has this “bump”…..she had this “pooch” when in St. Barth’s on her so-called “honeymoon”…..
One Trackback
[...] erlitten! Nicole Kidman und Keith Urban in einem Lebensmittelgeschäft in Sydney am Mittwoch: FOTOS [...]