COSTUME INSTITUTE GALA: ARRIVALS

Posted Tuesday, May 8th, 2007 at 1:49 am
Filed under: ,

dun.jpg

Rocking vintage Yves Saint Laurent and Fred Leighton bling, fashion fanatic Kirsten Dunst attended the Costume Institute Gala last night in NYC with her British rocker beau Johnny Borrell.

Our thoughts on Miss Dunst’s getup?

dun1.jpgdun2.jpg

Your Ad Here

18 Comments to “COSTUME INSTITUTE GALA: ARRIVALS”

  1. Stephi
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 2:21 am
    1

    Oh dear she looks a bit of a mess to me! She always looks like she’s rifled through a bag of her moms old dress ups and just thrown something together. I can almost smell the musty smell coming from this photo! I’m sure someone else would pull off this dress perfectly but she makes everything look slightly daggy in my opinion.
  2. SAS
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 3:59 am
    2

    ugh she is horrendous. i think a better person could have pulled off the gothic glamour but they both look like the living dead. yuck yuck yuck. i can’t stand this girl.
  3. Selon
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 4:06 am
    3

    No I think she looks good. Do remember it is the Costume Institute Gala; the outfits are meant to be unique and I daresay if the dress alone was worn by Charlize Theron et al there noone would comment so ferociously.
    Saying that, I really dislike the try-hard look and those two are more or less representative of that. Vogue cover with Natalia Vodianova - hmmm
  4. SAS
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 4:07 am
    4

    by better i mean more stylish of course.
  5. Luella
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 4:12 am
    5

    3 words: Hot Ass Mess
  6. shoe freak
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 4:24 am
    6

    I kinda like it. Very roaring ’20s. Of course she looks like Dunst but we forgive her for that.
  7. supernova
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 5:23 am
    7

    “Do remember it is the Costume Institute Gala; the outfits are meant to be unique ”

    Selon, we don’t need to be reminded of the obviouse - gee, it’s a COSTUME GALA, of course the dresses are meant to be over the top. But this bitch is over-the-top and BUTT-ASS UGLY. Since when does over-the-top mean that you have to be stupid-looking as well? Perhaps it’s YOU who should re-evaluate your understanding of a Costume Gala. I see at least a half-dozen of these a year living and New York and, rest-assured, the point is to be over-the-top and beautiful and elegant.
  8. spinner
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 5:42 am
    8

    Too much fabric for such a small girl but she is making it work for her to a degree.
  9. Lola lola
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 6:39 am
    9

    Is that a maternity dress?
  10. parissucksliterally
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 7:22 am
    10

    She is like a higher-end Britney. She usually gets it wrong.
  11. Cupcake
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 7:23 am
    11

    The head piece looks a bit sloppy…but she looks never looks put together anymore. And those cowboy boots on the outside of his pants…yuck!
  12. just askin'
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 8:24 am
    12

    She just doesn’t have enough presence to wear a gown like this. Which, by the way, is nothing exceptional–couture or not. Yves St. Laurent was obviously not in a good mood the day he designed this rag.

    The flapper-era headband is ridiculous. First off, La Dunst looks foolish in it. Second, the dress does not evoke the Roaring Twenties in the least, and so it’s a completely inappropriate accessory.
  13. cat
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 8:25 am
    13

    i kind of like it.. it certainly has an original look to it…can you imagine jessica simpson wearing that?? yikes
  14. Trinidad
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 10:07 am
    14

    He looks like that guy Bob Geldof! I just seen a documentry on Africa by him and so I remember him well. Man, this guy could be his son.
  15. Trinidad
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 10:10 am
    15

    Oh, and he’s got them boots on every picture I see of them! The 2 1/2 yr old wants to wear her bumble bee rain boots everyday and everywhere and I let her, even with a dress, but again, she’s 2 1/2. That’s a grown ass man and it’s not cute.
  16. Selon
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 12:57 pm
    16

    supernova - chill. I was just saying it’s all a matter of dress up. If you think Kirsten Dunst is “BUTT-ASS UGLY” then great but I think the dress in itself is nice enough. Kirsten does go too far on occasion but she is at least trying to experiment. Remember SJP in that tartan creation made by Alexander McQueen last year?: twas hardly the stuff that red carpets are made of but was exciting at the very least. Even if it looks shit I’m grateful for something different; if I have to look at another Vera Wang dress I’m going to scream! :-P
  17. audrey
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 3:30 pm
    17

    I kinda like the dress…it is a stunning color, I just don’t like who is wearing it. And the head thing? What is with that?
  18. sigh
    Posted: May 8th, 2007 at 9:15 pm
    18

    the dude looks cross-eyed.

    they’re such an odd-couple, but a good match *snigger*

    i like what the outfit is attempting to do, but it’s not working for her at all
SexyComments by BorkWeb

Leave a Reply