Posted Friday, November 30th, 2007 at 8:40 am
Filed under: Suri-Cruise
Superstar couple Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes has asked celebrity shoe mogul Christian Louboutin to design a pair of shoes for their irreplaceable daughter Suri.
The fashion designer is custom-making a pair of booties for the tot after taking a mould of her feet.
A source tells OK! magazine, “She’ll be the youngest client.”`
Yeah, not to mention the most spoiled!!
|
krissa Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 8:45 am |
1
what the hell else are they going to do with all that money??? |
|
Ava Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 9:06 am |
2
What well adjusted, down to earth parents. |
|
Black Velveteen Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 9:14 am |
3
Must be nice. I wish I could get a pair of custom made Louboutins |
|
Only 1 Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 9:21 am |
4
Katey looks TIRED |
|
TeeJ Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 9:31 am |
5
Would love a pair too. Now that I look at this picture of Suri and compare it with Katie’s new cut, I’d say that Katie looks like a life-size Suri doll. |
|
Sina Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 9:36 am |
6
why dies kATIE LOOK LIKE A RABBIT? |
|
BeJeeBus Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 10:35 am |
7
Katie always looks drugged up. I kinda fear for her well-being. She doesn’t look well with Tom. Must be hard always being showcased by your husband like you are some kind of prize and not his wife. |
|
beforesunrise Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 10:39 am |
8
^ I agree BJB, he’s always toting around his shiny new toy. |
|
MeSoup Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 11:06 am |
9
He just adores her that’s why. I think Kate is ok with it. DOn’t get me wrong, still think Tom is coo coo but whatever. Katie looks tired here because it looks like they just got off of a plane… I don’t know about you guys, but flying makes me so tired, even if it’s for just 2 hours, and I am sure she was taking care of Suri the whole time they were on that plane. |
|
parissucksliterally Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 11:18 am |
10
that is disgusting. |
|
Jane Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 2:25 pm |
11
“Kate” needs to get her teefs fixed. They are hideous. |
|
fortress Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 3:09 pm |
12
where are the adopted kids and shoes for them? |
|
Stephi Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 4:23 pm |
13
Oh how cute! I hope they have the little red soles on them! I don’t see why Katie and Tom can’t buy their daughter these shoes, and why it makes them any less of parents. They’ve got the money to spend on her, so why not? I’m sure she will be disciplined and not get everything her way, but what’s wrong with spoiling your child once in a while? |
|
parissucksliterally Posted: Nov 30th, 2007 at 6:35 pm |
14
Stephi, I KNEW that would be your reaction. (rolling eyes) |
|
dahlia Posted: Dec 1st, 2007 at 10:08 am |
15
>>but what’s wrong with spoiling your child once in a while? |
|
dahlia Posted: Dec 1st, 2007 at 10:12 am |
16
So how come my entire comment above (Number 15) was omitted????????? I was saying that spoiling a child once in a while is fine, provided you are actually spoiling *the child* and not just trying to show the world how filthy rich you are. Two-year-old children don’t care about how much their shoes cost. In fact, the usually hate wearing shoes altogether. And what about the fact that she will outgrow them in two-three MONTHS? |
|
Amy Posted: Dec 2nd, 2007 at 1:16 am |
17
psl it’s not like they don’t do anything for charity as well. i do think designer shoes is going overboard, but it isn’t my money to dictate how to spend. by your logic, you shouldn’t buy your child more than one toy because there are children out there without any. and that toy shouldn’t be a nice one either.. just adequate, because you should be spending the excess money on charity. charity is a beautiful thing, of course!! but you can’t just bitch about other peoples’ extravagances without coming across as a little bit jealous and bitter. i don’t pretend to know anyone here, but i could probably bet the cruises have done proportionately more for charity than any of us have. |
