WHAT A STAR!

nicole-kidman-clar-fadedyouthblog.JPG

Star of The Golden Compass Nicole Kidman offers photogs a quick smile before leaving Claridges Hotel in London on Tuesday after spending the morning doing interviews for the upcoming release of her new film.

Meanwhile, the United Nations women’s agency launched a campaign yesterday backed by the Aussie beauty to gather signatures on an Internet petition rejecting violence against women and urging action to stop it.

The launch of the petition titled “Say NO to violence against women,” is part of a 16-day U.N.-backed campaign to raise awareness about the issue and urge governments to make eliminating such violence a priority.

CLICK HERE to sign the petition and make your voice heard!!

nicole-kidman-clar-fadedyouthblog1.JPGnicole-kidman-clar-fadedyouthblog2.JPGnicole-kidman-clar-fadedyouthblog3.JPGnicole-kidman-clar-fadedyouthblog4.JPG

[Splash]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

15 Comments

  1. Anonymous
    November-27-2007 @ 10:19 am

    Why can’t she just go back to being a red head? That color just washes her out.

    I’m boycotting The Golden Compass anyway.

  2. supernova
    November-27-2007 @ 10:21 am

    My god. She’s starting to look like a crazy old rich lady from the Upper East Side in Manhattan. Too much money, too much plastic surgery, not enough reality check.

  3. blake
    November-27-2007 @ 10:27 am

    I think she looks beautiful. I admit that I’d like to see her as a redhead again, she was gorgeous in Moulin Rouge!
    And thanks for that link Arasto, I signed it and I hope everyone else does also!

  4. soshootme
    November-27-2007 @ 10:36 am

    her outfit is gorgeous. the skirt could be a tad shorter……..but all is still beautiful.

  5. adam
    November-27-2007 @ 10:39 am

    if you get gangraped in a muslim country, you can go to jail…after they give you 200 lashes.
    that is, if you don’t honor killed first.
    the UN is a fricking joke.

  6. grannytranny
    November-27-2007 @ 10:40 am

    Another vote for her (and Lindsay Lohan) to go back to red.

  7. Minorme
    November-27-2007 @ 10:50 am

    I do think she looks better with her red hair but she’s still beautiful,because in my opinion she’s an intelligent woman who carries herself with grace, and needless to say, she’s a bundle of talent.

  8. pillbox
    November-27-2007 @ 11:05 am

    really don’t care for her… but that jacket is crack!

  9. Michelle
    November-27-2007 @ 11:23 am

    hate the jacket. She kills me sometimes. One minute she’s crying because the paps give her no privacy and the next she’s smiling big & bold while her driver is trying to shoo them off. You can’t have it both ways. I wonder how she justifies the UN piece with her next role as a Nazi concentration camp guard and who has an affair with a 15 year old child. I guess it’s “do as I say and not as I do”. It’s all about the “art” I guess. Who cares about morals.

  10. Anonymous
    November-27-2007 @ 12:23 pm

    That’s disgusting Michelle, why does she do these movies that involved sex with children?

  11. TeeJ
    November-27-2007 @ 1:54 pm

    What is she wearing..looks like a tent of some sort. Bad choice. Nicki, nicki, nicki you can do way better than this.

  12. fume
    November-27-2007 @ 1:57 pm

    She probably “justifies” it because she’s an actor playing a role. Good grief. A film that has sexual themes and children is not automatically immoral and pornographic. That’s just simple-minded.

    Oh and that jacket is so Alexis Carrington Colby Dexter and in that way is fantastic.

  13. nic
    November-27-2007 @ 3:03 pm

    love the jacket…she’s an actor’s actor….that’s why she is always experimental!!!!

  14. supernova
    November-27-2007 @ 3:48 pm

    That coat is a little too Cruella D’ville for me.

  15. Sara
    November-28-2007 @ 2:00 am

    So pple shd stick to dreamy cotton candy themes that do not even remotely challenge viewers to think about pertinent issues?ANd if people plays certain roles in movies, then they automatically hold or adhere to those views? Thats just really naive. And besides, how do you know if the role she’s playing is gonna be portrayed in a positive light?There can be negative characters in a film too, ya know.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared.

Want your image to show up? Get a gravatar, it's easy.