As you may recall, it was during this day-long photo-shoot where the singer rubbed her greasy chicken fingered hands on her dress before letting her little Yorkie poop on a nearly $7000 Zac Posen creation.
Sadly, no amount of Photoshop or over-exposure can hide life’s symbolic trackmarks.
20 Comments
UGLY!! Doesn’t look like Brit.
Those are awesome shots. Of course it doesn’t “look” like Britney, not when you’re used to seeing all of those “in your face” pap shots that are never attractive for any celeb. She looks great and is doing well with her album.
The one on the left and centre look NOTHING like her. Her nose does not look like that WHATSOEVER. Who is she foolin’
she’s prettier than those pics. That photopgrapher should be fired.
(I can’t believe I’m saying this)
I think the shots for her Blackout album are amazing even though they are photoshopped. But these.. they make Britney look like shit. Sorry, but the real Britney has beautiful big eyes and nice eyebrows. And her skin in these shots looks like plain paper.. I like the shot on the right though. It’s nice. Sorry if I sounded rude, cause I like Britney a lot.
I agree, these look nothing like her. But people! For fuck sake, let go of the photoshop crap. Every model, every magazine cover is and always will be photoshopped and editted. Get the fuck over it!
well of course they don’t look like her. they have her backlit and overexposed to obscure the outline of her thighs and arms, just like they did in her music video.
brit doesn’t have big beautiful eyes. she used to make puppy dog eyes a log, but now she no longer does, and her face has filled out considerably, making them relatively small.
overall she was never very pretty. just toned and sleazy with nice teeth, but nothing special. a few pounds and a few pimples can take people down a notch. and i don’t think we should hate on britney just because she’s not a beauty queen anymore, but not having looks to rely on does highlight her complete lack of talent, dignity, composure, sanity, parental instincts, taste in clothes, taste in men, taste in friends…
I don’t mind a bit of photoshopping every now and then, but the centre photo doesn’t even resemble Britney. They are supposed to look like themselves, even if they are photoshopped. That’s lame! She looks like Jamie-Lynn more than herself.. I don’t know. The mutant nose is doing it!
Oh and Zac Posen is CRAPOLA anway. I’d use that shit for my dogs to poop on as well if I were a dog person.
I think the one on the right is good…the left and center look nothing like her…it’s no wonder these never made it to the magazine…yes photoshop is that way it’s going…but her nose didn’t need the unnecessary work…I think the 3rd one only looks like her because of the trademark headband she is wearing that she sported for so many months…
Give me a break. OK Magazine is a second rate In Touch. If Brit really pissed them off so much, why are they using her on the cover? Because she sells magazines!
Didn’t anyone notice from the beginning that she was attractive only in a white-trash, trailer-park way? It’s not as if Audrey Hepburn let herself go. And I don’t “hate on” Britney [what an odd expression that is]. I think she’s far past her sell-by date. I think her lack of talent caught up with her. And I think she’s a mother only in a biological sense, and that she lost interest in her children as soon as they stopped being cute– probably the first time she was confronted with a loaded diaper. It’s sad and disturbing to watch her keep digging instead of trying to climb out of the hole she’s in, and I’m trying to stop looking at the slow-motion train wreck, but damn, she’s hard to avoid, she’s bloody everywhere.
as someone previously said a while back, Britney is a breeder, not a mother.
How is Britney channeling her inner Katharine McPhee? That sentence doesn’t make any sense. Katharine McPhee always look gorgeous, even in surprise paparazzi shots, but especially in this type of professional shoot. And yes, she gets photoshopped too, which is like gilding the lily to be sure!
Hmm - I see what you mean, she is trying to look like Katharine McPhee, and not succeeding very well. That says a lot about Katharine that Britney is trying to emulate her and it says a lot about Britney’s own lack of creativity and individualism. Move over Britney, your time is up. Not that Katharine is the new Britney, she could be the new Britney before breakfast, she is so much more than that, she can be the new Britney just for a laugh.
Now i’m NO Britney Spears Fan. Never have been. But Jesus she used to be so feirce when she took a picture, this shit is just sad.
I agree, Harlie. She used to look amazing when she took a picture. Now this is very pathetic.
she doesnt even look like herself in that first one. the third one is the only one where she seems human.
britney will be attractive i feel. she just doesnt have the same lolita appeal as before..
I’m not a fan of these photos. She looks great but not as good as she could look. That last picture is nice, she looks like a real person and very naturally pretty. The other two are a bit skanky and not the look that Britney should be going for. The pictures in her album cover are HOT!