THE PAPARAZZI ARE CREEPS
Posted Monday, November 5th, 2007 at 2:15 pm
Filed under: Mary-Louise-Parker
Mary-Louise Parker and her two kids were confronted by an army of blood-hungry paparazzi as they arrived at JFK over the weekend.
Despite her best efforts to protect her bundles of joy, photogs had the Weeds actress cornered defenseless. Très disturbing.
Sorta makes you wonder why it isn’t illegal to take photos of minors for sale to tabloids.
November 5th, 2007 at 2:24 pm
That’s very disturbing. As a parent that infuriates me. How is it that no one in Hollywood has snapped and open fire on these creeps? And what kind of ahole am I that I buy into all this by reading celebrity blogs?
November 5th, 2007 at 2:31 pm
Mary Louise Parker loos like a piece of work. She acts like it’s gonna kill the baby to have its picture took.
November 5th, 2007 at 3:10 pm
“She acts like it’s gonna kill the baby to have its picture took.”
it’s a fucking baby! - it’s not a celebrity therefore it shouldn’t have it’s pic taken. the paprazzi in the u.s should be licensed, it’s known that in l.a a couple of the paparazzi are convicted paedophiles out snapping pics of reese witherspoons kids etc… it’s disturbing & grotesque … not to mention all the other paps that have been in prison, all the gang bangers & illegals that mainly make up the l.a paparazzi. i know this is n.y but still.
November 5th, 2007 at 3:30 pm
It wouldn’t kill the baby to have her picture taken. That’s SCARY…they followed her into a closed space. They have the capability to use long lenses and not get that close. People wonder why stars lash out and get violent. It’s disturbing and a complete violation of privacy and personal space. The STARS are fair game to an extent. Innocent children are not. I give her kudos for not flipping out and pepper spraying those people. I sure would have.
November 5th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
I meant to add the ones who say it wouldn’t kill to have the kids picture taken must not be parents.
And it’s taken, not took.
November 5th, 2007 at 3:41 pm
SureThing - I don’t have kids and I feeel the same way as your . Its disgusting.
Children should not have their pictures taken. And if they are taken, the faces should be blurred out. Its dangerous with all the pedaphiles in the world. Would it be that hard to blur out the faces? And maybe Im alone in this but I dont care what celebs kids are doing, I just care about the celebs! Ha!
November 5th, 2007 at 4:38 pm
They should have to stay well back when little kids are involved–need a law. That kind of thing can scare the hell out of a little child. Something needs to be done about it.
November 5th, 2007 at 5:20 pm
I agree they crossed the line especially since she was boxed in inside of an elevator — they prevented the doors from closing to get pictures! It’s ridiculous. Sure, she’s a celeb and has to expect this (and has lived with it) but damn - let the woman walk with her kids.
November 5th, 2007 at 5:47 pm
LEAVE MARY-LOUISE ALONE!!!
November 5th, 2007 at 7:15 pm
Why do you think she adopted a baby from Africa?
So the paparazzi would take her picture!
November 5th, 2007 at 7:32 pm
I saw a show this weekend on the “new” papparazzi. They said with the invention of the digital camera most of the rules went out the window. Used to they’d try to get a posed pic of celebrities by a semi-professional and move on. Now they just hire ‘whoever’ give them a camera with a memory card holding 5k pics, tell them to try and cause a scene, point and click and they hope something good comes out of it.
November 6th, 2007 at 6:49 am
I agree Barks; these high speed digital cameras with huge memory seem to have changed the whole paparazzi scene. I notice a lot of those guys don’t look like pro phototogs at all.
November 6th, 2007 at 7:19 am
It’s a little hypocrite that some people here say those photographers are wrong. A lot of people that visit sites like this drool over pictures of Bragelina’ kids. Yes, it’s wrong but celebs have to deal with it. And if they hate the fact that their kids are photographed they can go to court like Princess Caroline did.
November 7th, 2007 at 9:49 pm
Actually, you’ve raised an interesting point here. I have absolutely no urge to see any celebrity’s kids. I’m occuasionally curious what a non-famous spouse or significant other looks like but otherwise I could do without seeing any family pictures.