30 Comments to “A VERY SCARY HALLOWEEN INDEED”

1. dd Posted: Oct 31st, 2007 at 11:40 pm

   1 I feel sorry for Britney

2. Me Myself Posted: Oct 31st, 2007 at 11:40 pm

   2 Hopefully she can do some bonding. Halloween is great for the kiddies, hope she made some memories.

3. Me Myself Posted: Oct 31st, 2007 at 11:41 pm

   3 Despite all the battering, I feel sorry for her too dd.

4. my2cents Posted: Oct 31st, 2007 at 11:47 pm

   4 Arasto that was some hilarious writing! She is crazy as all hell.

5. hairball Posted: Oct 31st, 2007 at 11:53 pm

   5 They should have gone trick or treating in very early evening since they are so young and need to go to bed at a decent time (by 7:30). I don’t feel sorry for her anymore.

6. Anonymous Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 12:26 am

   6 Brit is all : ” Shut up JJ, you will wear the dog and you will LOVE IT. Down in the south we didn’t have no money to throw around on stupid halloween dress-ups, we had to make that shit from scratch y’all. Sean, I told you that you had to make the costume by today y’all. If you snooze you lose. Now here’s some paper for y’allz, go and buy momma 4 packs of cigs and a jumbo pack o’cheetos. There’s gonna be a party up in here, Y*ALL!!!

7. SAS Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 12:35 am

   7 ^ ^ LMAO! I’m probably totally missing the point here as we don’t do halloween over here and I think its kind of pointless but who takes kids that young trick or treating? Like hairball said its totally late plus all the lollies are really bad for them! I do not feel sorry for this trainwreck one bit, i feel sorry for her kids who get brit’s problems inflicted on them.

8. Stephi Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 12:47 am

   8 Don’t be ridiculous!! They are terrified because strange men with flashing cameras are harassing their mother and tapping on the windows and stuff. That’s an awful environment for children, and something that Britney can’t really help. Even if she moved to Siberia I think she would be followed there. jayden looks like a little cutie and what’s to say Sean wasn’t in a costume? It’s not like you can see what he is wearing in this picture. Good to see her taking them somewhere they would want to go though, instead of shopping and stuff.

9. boohoo Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 1:07 am

   9 ^^my thoughts exactly. Fucking gazillions of flashes going off in a two year old’s face and the story is “look at the kids, their terrified of their mother.” BUT I’d be staying my ass home. I wouldn’t want to put my kids through that. Hire the help to go fetch your Starbucks bitch!

10. boohoo Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 1:08 am

    10 they’re–they’re

11. Adoh Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 2:03 am

    11 I feel sorry for Britney because she’s been judged at every move she does. It’s imposible for a child to be “terrified” by his/her own mother, stop talking bs about brit and her children. PLEASE!

12. TrashyCeleb Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 2:22 am

    12 As a proud parent to a couple little ones about Britney’s kids age - those poor little guys. Usually I am sarcastic and rude and swear a lot and make sex jokes but this just makes me sadface. I really don’t think these kids are getting what they need from this drunken wackjob. Unless theure are in the mood for starbucks, vodka and doritos.

13. supernova Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 2:29 am

    13 ^ It is not “impossible” for a child to be “terrified” by his/her own mother Adoh. Clearly, you know nothing about abused children (especially those who have been severely traumatized at a young age). Of course, that’s not what’s happening with Britney (she’s just a shitty, selfish mother and, at most, her kids probably just don’t like being around her - which is clear from their miserable faces in every fucking photo). But children can very well be “terrified” of their own mother (or father). There are too many case studies, books, movies, foster care systems full of abused kids and people who have that experience for you to emphatically make such an ignorant statement in this day and age. Brit is a selfish cunt - anyone who feels sorry for her is an enabler of a selfish cunt. She only has those kids three times a week and she STILL can’t manage to be a good caring mother. I FEEL SORRY FOR THOSE BABIES BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE A CHOICE BUT TO PUT UP WITH HER — THEY’RE MOTHER CARES MORE ABOUT THE PAPARAZZI AND DRUGS THAN SHE DOES FOR THEM — so says the court of law.

14. May Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 3:02 am

    14 Well put, supernova. I couldn’t agree more. She’s a an abhorringly selfish, careless, clueless, stupid, incompetent drunken crack whore. Everything she does just yells “Me, me, me!” She never plans any activity in the true interest of children, and the parenting coach said so herself. She just does what she feels at any given moment, and we’ve seen often enough what stupid activities are that. When she learns the custody was taken away, she goes tanning. When she learns she’s not getting hte custody back and she’s stuck with only three visits per week, she goes partying and house-hunting. When asked by Ryan Seacrest how often she will be seeing the kids, her reply was: “I don’t know, my lawyer knows about that.” Does she even care? Of course not. It’s a pity that the court granted her three visitations because the stupid skank does not deserve even that. How could she give the kids ’structure’ in their lives when she doesn’t have any structure (or any brains) herself. Hell, she doesn’t even know what structure is. Why are animals like her allowed to reproduce?

15. Janie Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 3:44 am

    15 I would think it would be K-Fed’s responsiblity to buy the costumes and have the kids dressed with Britney comes to pick them up. She gets those kids 18 hours a week MAX if you include the one overnight stay, he has them the rest of the time. He should be the one taking them shopping, etc.

16. Ugghh! Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 4:52 am

    16 Couldn’t she have tinted windows and a driver? She WANTS the photogs to follow her every move!! She is sooo out of touch with what her children are experiencing (a nightmare I am sure) …all she thinks about is HER parties, HER tanning, HER DAILY run to get coffee… What I am trying to say is if she cares at all for these little boys she would do what many celebs do which is to move away from Hollywood and raise them out of the limelight. She has the money, God knows. She is a self-promoting media whore who will get herself into the news every day…in spite of what she is doing to her kids. She lives in Hollywood yet won’t even promote her own album!! Why does she need to be there and live her daily life in front of photographers?? This is exactly what Britney Spears wants and until the public says we don’t care about her any more, bring on a star with real talent — then Britney is going to continue her shameless self promotion. Don’t you dare feel sorry for her — she is doing exactly what she wants. SHE IS SHAMELESS AND OUT OF CONTROL!! And K-Fed may be a gold digger and loser, but you don’t see him every day out in the public eye with his kids.

17. Da Devil Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 4:58 am

    17 of course she wants press! Otherwise she would go to college and have a decent life of effort and everyday rutines… She would create asense of idenity based in other than her stupid body. But she is so near sighted that even while taking all the public attention she still dressed like she is in pijamas and belongs to a trailer park: meaning not even effort to support her superficial “talent” SHE is one spoiled dumb tacky idiot

18. Meg Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 5:15 am

    18 wtf did she do to her eyebrows?

19. yeahso? Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 5:19 am

    19 if her fas-riddled children are so terrified of the paps and britney is such a ‘good mother’ then she wouldn’t have her window rolled down for the paps to get their daily shot…hey y’all look i gots my boo-boos.

20. Private Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 5:23 am

    20 Cut her some slack. Do you have kids yourself? If not, then you are unaware of the stubbornness of children. Maybe they didn’t want to be pumpkins? Maybe she tried to put their costumes on and they started crying and throwing a tantrum? Having two children under the age of 3 is really hard to handle for some people. So because she’s not Super Mom we should all pelt her with stones? I think Britney is trying to live a normal life. She goes and does as she pleases instead of hiding away in her house. Why should she? How would you feel if every single time you had to leave your house for a gas fill up or to run to the grocery store, you had to have perfect hair and make up? That would be such a pain and get old really fast. She doesn’t owe it to anybody to look and act perfect 24/7.

21. hiedi Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 5:39 am

    21 It is COMPLETELY normal to take kids that young out for Halloween! Everyone does it! And it gets dark by 7:00 now, so I doubt this is in the middle of the night. Who says the kids have to be in bed by 7:30 every night? Mine go to bed at 9:00 and they do just fine. However, on special occasions, like holidays or if we have family visiting and whatnot, they do sometimes stay up later. It’s not the end of the world if the kids are a little late on bed time once in a while. I hope they had a great Halloween, and I really hope she can get her shit together so they can have the mom they deserve. But I’m sick of the nit-picking!

22. parissucksliterally Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 6:33 am

    22 I agree with Supernova….. …..and it’s Beverly Park, not Park Beverly.

23. parissucksliterally Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 6:40 am

    23 I thought she didn’t have the kids, because she was out getting wasted with her friends later….oh wait, that doesn’t matter- she gets wasted whether or not she has the kids. She doesn’t care- she doesn’t talk or interact with the boys- (driving them places doesn’t count.)…even the Parenting Coach said so.

24. Barks Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 7:01 am

    24 Actually, Private, she owes it to her kids to STRIVE to be perfect, no one makes it but every parent should TRY. If she would just admit she is a bad mother and ask for help it would go so much easier on her plus be better for the kids in the long run. Unfortunately she won’t and I don’t think that judge is going to suddenly start going easy on her.

25. kat Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 7:07 am

    25 how can you make the statement “I think Britney is trying to live a normal life”???? NORMAL mothers of children that young do NOT go out partying every night! When you become a mom… you come second! NORMAL mothers put thier children first!

26. toonkinstein Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 7:23 am

    26 partly engaged..she dressed one baby up and forgot she had two….poor Sean P. he will be writing an expose when he grows up..”Scary Mommy: Which One Will She Be?”…..these kids are going to grow up fu*ked…wait another 10 years and they will be on trial for off-ing Shitney…and they will claim self defense.

27. F.U. Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 7:42 am

    27 She deserves for those kids to grow up and never speak to her again. It wasn’t good enough for her to ruin her own life, she had to go and bring two innocent human beings into the world to damage as well. What a selfish cunt.

28. Wycancha Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 8:27 am

    28 Sean P MAY have refused to wear whatever get-up she had picked out. Not defending her because there’s no defense that works, but kids that age are hit and miss about the costume part of Halloween.

29. K Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 10:20 am

    29 I want to see more pictures of the boys!!! I haven’t seen these on any of the paparazzi sites…where did you get them from?! Sweetest boys ever. Why doesn’t she want to be their mom?

30. Anonymous Posted: Nov 1st, 2007 at 1:04 pm

    30 Her kids always look so frightened.. they might be both retarded… and scared of everything

Search

Faded Links

• Design*Sponge
• MuchMusic
• popbytes
• TMZ
• X17 Online
• Y, B, & F

The Vault

• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
• December 2007
• November 2007
• October 2007
• September 2007
• August 2007
• July 2007
• June 2007
• May 2007
• April 2007
• March 2007

• 
  RSS FEED