Posted Sunday, October 28th, 2007 at 4:08 pm
Filed under: Paris Hilton
It’s Paris in La La Land!!!!!
Oops…looks like the party heiress got her holidays mixed up again.
Rather than donning something festively appropriate, Paris was looking very much like a hoe, hoe, hoe as she pigeon-toed her way to a Halloween party on Saturday night.
Funky contacts….sorta reminds us of Night Vision Paris circa 2004’s ‘1 Night in Paris.’
Now that’s hot!
|
Da Devil Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:10 pm |
1
def in the level style the Britney…the eyes pair the kitch in the purse…. |
|
parissucksliterally Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:18 pm |
2
eeeuww. eeuuww. eeeeuuwww. |
|
Meg Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:20 pm |
3
I’ve always said that Halloween was just an excuse for women to dress like hoes… and Paris is the perfect example. |
|
4.54 Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:22 pm |
4
Arasto, sweetie, a “hoe” is a garden tool. |
|
Anonymous Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:22 pm |
5
Those lenses are ruining a perfectly cute outfit. Wont say anything about Paris though.. |
|
la dee da Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:25 pm |
6
I TOTALLY AGREE WITH MEG!!! i think i said the same thing like 100+ times already. WHY go slutty?? they mass produce the same FREAKIN outfits. SAME HOOCHIE DRESS with different accesories…whoopty doo! what happened to being creative and making your own costumes? |
|
Miss Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:25 pm |
7
i like the wicked lenses. you can tell from her ass that she doesn’t work out. |
|
beforesunrise Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:25 pm |
8
Oh, silly me, I though that at Halloween you were supposed to wear a costume, not just show off you underwear. |
|
parissucksliterally Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:29 pm |
9
I think someone needs to inform Paris that you CAN get costumes somewhere besides Trashy Lingerie….and I don’t mean Frederick’s of Hollywood. |
|
beforesunrise Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:32 pm |
10
OT |
|
Aysla Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:45 pm |
11
And this is why this girl will never earn anyone’s respect. Shudder. Anyway, I put together my costume this year– I dressed as my own version of Cupid ;o). What were some of your costumes? The best costume I saw this year were these three or four guys dressed as the Droogs from A Clockwork Orange (complete with bats and a cane). |
|
Aysla Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:46 pm |
12
On a side note, I just scrolled down and saw that the KK post has over 130+ posts. That is just sad. |
|
Agustina Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:48 pm |
13
I like the lenses. The only thing cool about her costume. |
|
Miss Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 4:53 pm |
14
^^^she doesn’t need to gain or care to gain anyone’s respect , she is Paris Hilton who is practically American royalty since we don’t have such thing. She’s tall, thin, hot, blonde and rich and that’s what sells here. She has a name which we can’t say about too many other Americans…she is a heiress, old money baby!!! |
|
Shell Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 5:30 pm |
15
Obviously Paris chose not to dress up this year?? |
|
Shell Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 5:37 pm |
16
Miss……. I beg to differ on the “American Royalty” comment… When I think Hollywood Royalty, Jack Nicholson and Elizabeth Taylor come to mind. Even Jackie O. People who have earned respect from their peers in their craft. Not this tramp. |
|
Shell Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 5:38 pm |
17
**Not Hollywood Royalty…. American Royalty. |
|
BeJeeBus Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 5:39 pm |
18
God she is such a whore! That’s all. |
|
parissucksliterally Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 5:49 pm |
19
Thank you Shell, I won’t even approach that comment. It was one of the stupidest things I have ever read on this blog. |
|
Meg Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 5:57 pm |
20
Ditto PLS. American Royalty? Please. Maybe for those with too little comprehension to understand that she popular because the general public is simply fascinated with her stupidity. oh and she a whore. |
|
Meg Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 5:58 pm |
21
“she’s” |
|
Da Devil Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 6:00 pm |
22
A better word is nepostism. |
|
Shell Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 6:02 pm |
23
DD: You forgot the other ‘n’ word…. narscisism |
|
Miss Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 6:14 pm |
24
Shell you taking about Hollywood, movies, etc, i’m saying she’s American royalty, there is a difference. Here we don’t care as much for old money where around most of the world it’s everything that’s why Paris is an international star, it’s because of her name and here appearance, as yes her attitude, if she was some prude miss perfect no one here would care about her because America doesn’t find a girl with a Natalie Portman image as fascinating, that’s why Paris doesn’t need talent, it’s her name, looks and behavior that make her a hit. |
|
4.54 Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 6:16 pm |
25
Miss, generally royalty is well-respected, something Paris Hilton definitely lacks. People pay attention to her because it’s wonderful to watch her screw around and make an ass of herself, we don’t look to her as a shining example of what our society’s capable of producing. |
|
snipe Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 6:19 pm |
26
My name is snipe and I must admit that I like this costume… ::sob:: ..and , AND I actually love the contacts. |
|
parissucksliterally Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 6:22 pm |
27
Hilton money isn’t realy that old. |
|
snipe Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 6:34 pm |
28
Agree with PSL. Wasn’t Paris’ grandfather a house painter or something? Not to disparage honest labour or anything, but it’s not like her family’s descended from royalty or anything. After listening to her interviews, I am sure she has some kind of learning impairment. She doesn’t get IT, y’know??? |
|
Aysla Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 6:40 pm |
29
Miss– I disagree. She does care and need to gain respect. If she wanted to live life as an heiress and leave it at that, then she could do whatever the hell she likes without much detriment to herself (unless she was disinherited for said actions…), but considering she’s trying to market herself as a product… i.e., perfumes, books, clothes, etc…. I’d say it matters a hell of a lot. It’s why she has a publicist. She wouldn’t need to have one or care about generating positive PR if the publics’ perception and opinion of her didn’t matter. The American royalty bit is such BS. |
|
Da Devil Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 6:56 pm |
30
Paris Sucks: Old money….what is that supposed to mean? Better? Worse? WHY? |
|
parissucksliterally Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 7:08 pm |
31
I’m not the one who has that attitude, it’s the Rich People…..relax…….. |
|
Pingback:
Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 7:18 pm |
32
Paris Hilton at the Playboy Mansion at GossipChic.com[...] Source: Faded Youth Blog [...] |
|
Da Devil Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 7:29 pm |
33
ah? what attitude? |
|
Shell Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 7:52 pm |
34
I don’t think old money / new money is better than the other, but when I think ‘old’ money, I think money from more than 3 generations back. On the biography channel, an author who researched the Hilton’s said he believed Paris’ grandfather would be proud of the publicity she brought to the name. Somehow I don’t think a man of his perserverance (he went bankrupt more than once) and intelligence (he built his empire from the ground up with is own two hands) would be proud of what she represents and how she capitalizes on the name for her own benefit. What does she contribute? Nothing but sales receipts as far as I can tell. |
|
Anonymous Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 7:58 pm |
35
Who knows what Kathy Hilton’s father was about, but Paris’ paternal grandfather, Barron, was the one who challenged his father’s (Conrad) will. Conrad Hilton left the majority of his estate to the Catholic church, Barron contested and the will was overturned. Makes you wonder where Paris & Nikki would be now if the court had ruled another way? |
|
someone Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 9:18 pm |
36
i want some poor homeless guy to grab her by the neck and rape her! i want him to rip her clothes off, humiliate her by rubbing dirt on her face and spitting in her mouth. i also want this guy to kill her by sliting her throat and stuffiing a gun in her pussy and shoot some loads. i also want her to get the AIDS virus lol. |
|
style for style Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 9:21 pm |
37
she knows that it’s her wild behavior that gets her attention….thats why she does it. of course america is going to watch someone if they are making a fool out of themselves…espcially if that person was born with every advantage in the world! shes really just a sad insecure girl putting on an act, you know? i hope she doesnt go crazy when she starts to age…her looks are the only thing she really has going for her. I dont think that people would hate her so much if she didnt shove her wealth and privlidge in everyones face…thats really what pisses everyone off about her. |
|
Natalie Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 9:27 pm |
38
Meg is right, seems like none of these women are really making an effort to celebrate Halloween, they’re just using the opportunity to dress like tarts and get away with it. |
|
someone Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 9:31 pm |
39
paris should just walk the streets naked for halloween, that way people who walk by can rape and fuck her which is what she wants more than anything. maybe stuff snickers bars into her loose lil cunt. then have people eat her out! lol lol.yeah sounds like plans for next years halloween. |
|
Anonymous Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 11:05 pm |
40
“someone” sounds like kitten. hahahaha they angry-ness sounds familiar. lol! |
|
Anonymous Posted: Oct 28th, 2007 at 11:07 pm |
41
i like scenario # 1 someone. the idea of a HOBO sounds better lol |
|
aneurysm Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 1:25 am |
42
she has a fantastic derriere & i’m sure there are knickers under that skirt. you guys fail to understand, she was going to a playboy party. do you think she should have gone as a nun? given the event, she was dressed appropriately. also, she’s tall. that outfit would almost come to most girls’ knees, but being tall, it is extremely hard to find mini dresses that aren’t too mini. she has been doing extremely well. cut her some slack. & i agree w/ a previous poster, she is modern day glamorous, taking from icons generations past. love paris. |
|
Pop Crunch Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 2:19 am |
43
Those contacts are freaky. |
|
Miss Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 3:14 am |
44
If money comes from 2 generations then it’s considered old money. i live in an area that has quite a bit of “new money” and i think most of them are tacky in the way they flaunt it and live there lives. that’s just my opinion , i don’t like new money. America has no royalty and women here don’t make it big unless they are fools, tramps, etc, that is of course if they have no talent which is true for many of our young role models/starlets. Paris is able to sell her name on perfume’s and other merchandise because of her name..Hilton. Who else could do that that’s not a so called singer or pop star? It’s her name that makes her the star first. |
|
European girl Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 3:32 am |
45
American Royalty??? Royalty, first of all, has something to do with political power, second with royal status of this power (what basically means, it’s “given” by God) when one person or limited group of people become the source of sovereignty, and third, USA is a representative democracy and the whole nation is this source. Even if we leave out the last and royalty exists in the U.S. what does it have to do with the girl with the sex tape and her family? It is not even the richest family in the country. |
|
BeJeeBus Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 4:43 am |
46
American Royalty? That is by far one of the dumbest and most hilarious things I have ever heard in here. Are you out of your mind? She is the very epitome of what’s wrong with the world today. She belongs in the fucking gutter! |
|
meena Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 5:22 am |
47
” It is not even the richest family in the country.” I agree.she’s worth like 30 million??thats nothing.and she’s far from ”royalty” because royal people are powerful.they close the whole store if someone royal comes to shop,I doubt that they do that for Paris.royal ppl are powerful,she is not.release of her sextape and jail??if she was royal that would never happen. |
|
Da Devil Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 5:33 am |
48
OK, She is sleasy and tacky, but to put her sexuality againt her self is soooo taliban, mysoginistic, and so out of the limit of people…is her life. If she want to be vapid and useless while exploiting her forms, well is her moronic decision. Those coments about “punishing” her for being her, are propper of dudes that end up burning women just because the don’t agree with women freedom on their sexuality and autonomy. I say to them: you are doomed. Miss: America has no royalty …Really?! I thought The monacos took a chunk of genes in their appearence when Grace Kelly jumped across the pond… The ramanent royals in europe are just a romantic nationalist take on the MOST FUCKED traditon in the planet: humans that abused power justified in god’s right….MMM and to fight rrligious fundamentalism while adoring royalty…ooooh sooooo unconscious. …..and women here don’t make it big unless they are fools, tramps, etc, that is of course if they have no talent which is true for many of our young role models/starlets. Realy?! Wake up poeple and look arround. If you keep balming women for their sexuality you are only perpetuating abuse. |
|
Da Devil Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 5:53 am |
49
Now, If you wanna get some perspective on real economics nowdays, I recommend reading: |
|
Shell Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 7:16 am |
50
IMO: American Royalty was at it’s epitome with Jackie O. |
|
BeJeeBus Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 8:15 am |
51
Da Devil I don’t agree at all. You can be a sexual person without perpetually showing your coochie to the entire world. That’s just disgusting and I would like to distance myself from whomever thinks that’s “sexual liberation”. This is not a political matter. Let’s be real. We are discussing whether Paris is a whore or not. Mentioning emale empowerment in the same sentence as Paris is just not right, and I am sure all those angry groups of women would mob you for that comment alone :o) I am not saying we should stone her (WTF?) but she definitely does’t deserve respect and adoration from young girls, or anyone for that matter. Being awarded for acting like a stupid prick is not the way it’s supposed to go. |
|
cutie pie Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 10:01 am |
52
that flat ass is nasty and skanky looking, what a waste of human flesh on such a nasty troll, she should go live with her fucking dogs. and for someone i want a bunch of white men to rape her with their little peckers till she gets tired of the sliding out and go grab a dog and hump the dog. i would love to see this worthless bitch go fuck off somewhere. |
|
Anony Posted: Oct 29th, 2007 at 10:07 am |
53
So she’s Alice in PornoLand? |
|
piper Posted: Oct 30th, 2007 at 6:36 am |
54
Ooh, Zombie French Maid! |
|
Stephi Posted: Oct 30th, 2007 at 6:38 pm |
55
I wouldn’t expect anything less from Paris Hilton! She looks cute and by wearing the contacts she kind of makes it scarier and less slutty. So many girls just see Halloween as an opportunity to dress up as skanky as possible…but I guess thats just the way it is. It’s sometimes fun to dress up a bit sluttier than you normally would. Paris looks pretty good here. I think the contacts are awesome! |
|
Pingback:
Posted: Oct 31st, 2007 at 12:03 pm |
56
Faded Youth Blog » Blog Archive » ELLEN SHOWS OFF HER GLOW FOR HALLOWEEN[...] in Wonderland. Somehow, we figure she’ll do it in a classier manner than Paris Hilton did last weekend. var AdBrite_Title_Color = ‘CC0000′; var AdBrite_Text_Color = ‘000000′; var [...] |
