JEN WANTS TO GET BACK WITH JOHN

john-mayer-jen-together-again

Here we go again!

Jennifer Aniston is reportedly interested in rekindling her twice failed romance with tabloid star John Mayer.

The 40-year-old actress has apparently been telling friends that after an evening of drunk dialing, she’s back in contact with her ex and the former couple are considering a reconciliation.

“[He] wasn’t calling her or texting her. But, as she got lonelier and the shoot wore on, she started reaching out to him, sometimes very late at night and sometimes after a few too many glasses of wine,” a friend tells Heat Magazine.

This time around, however, she is not getting the support from her entire cast of pals. On-again, off-again BFF Courteney Cox is said to be particularly unhappy over Jen’s unwillingness to give up on John.

“Courteney is the biggest objector to a John reunion,” adds the insider. “They never got along and Courteney is someone who has always told Jennifer she’s just too good for John. Jennifer’s friends do not like John Mayer. But Jen, as always, acts from the heart, and if she loses a couple of friends in the course of getting back together with John, then so be it.”

They say you can’t teach an old dog new tricks and the same rule seems to apply to Miss Aniston.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

13 Comments

  1. parissucksliterally
    May-26-2009 @ 12:02 pm

    bullshit.

  2. chicken cutlets
    May-26-2009 @ 12:12 pm

    seriously, i don’t know how jennifer lives with all the horrible crap written about her. she’s protrayed as this childless spinster who can’t find a man. i’d be mortified.

  3. Anonymous
    May-26-2009 @ 12:15 pm

    Do you make this stuff up first thing in the morning? Or do you marinate in this crap for a couple of days before posting?

    Get off her back!!

  4. Anonymous
    May-26-2009 @ 12:16 pm

    “a friend of hers” who actually never met her and works in a tabloid office and has space to fill because they need to sell more copies to pay off mortgages said….IT LIES FOR DOLLARS………. HEAT MAGAZINE is UK BASED AND IS ALWAYS INVENTING STORIES. IT WAS A SHOWMANCE FYI.

  5. .
    May-26-2009 @ 12:23 pm

    The truth is that Mayer and Aniston were never a couple. It was all acted. That is why he was tipping off the pap agencies, and leaving his car at her house overnight, while he got rides out hidden in the back of cars/limos, on the floor of the back seat under a blanket. HE WAS SEEN TRYING TO SNEAK OUT !!! VAUGHN DID THE SAME TRICK. It was a PR war against Pitt and Jolie. Organised by CAA who manages Aniston, (contractually) Sculfor, Diaz, Mayer, and Vaughn etc…. He has been meeting women on Twitter, sleeping with them as long as they are discreet. Their “relationship” was a SHAM from the beginning. The TWITTER “break up” excuse is a joke; they have no reason to “break up” and now they know audiences know they were faking it, they don’t even care to explain. They did ANYTHING to gain publicity over Pitt to win the Christmas war…..even pose nearly nu-de, talk about pregnancy, create marriage rumors for publicity…etc…Her personal life is HIDDEN. He agreed to a contract to run concurrent with her production, Marley and Me. That is why their (acted) relationship started at the beginning of M&M and ended as soon as the film delivered it was a publicity stunt, funded by the production: same as TBU. What people posting don’t understand is that she doesn’t want a judge a jury of her personal life, and the investors don’t want her personal life effecting the film’s gross return. So that is the truth, and what is more bizarre is that Vince did the same thing with TBU (same as Sculfor). They had a fictional relationship too, that seemed to people reading magazines, as though it was real. It wasn’t. It was all for publicity to stop nosy people like you guys asking personal questions that have nothing to do with you. She owes you NOTHING except a performance after you buy the ticket.

  6. reality is not what you read
    May-26-2009 @ 12:28 pm

    John Mayer very insulting and arrogant behind the scenes : you don’t know. He copies from males, steals their ideas and tries to rival other males. That is his focus and that is what sent him gay. RIVALRY. It is all a sexual competition between him and his brother, that he never fully resolved in his childhood. So he projects that incomplete sexual energy (with his brother) into other men : copying them, trying to outdo them by cloning them and pushing ahead…… instead making himself look artificial, desperate, stretched and vulgar.

    “Visiting the Diamond Exchange in Tustin.”

    Welding an engagement ring for my girlfriend.3:23 AM Jan 31st

    “Let me just tell you that Jen is a huge liar and we are having twins,”

    “I’ll be Jennifer Aniston’s (HIRED) Oscars boyfriend.”

    “Bull-twitter”

    “chatting with Britain’s Heat magazine”…………THEY ARE MAKING THE STORY UP ……BASED ON WHATEVER SALACIOUS FICTION THE EDITORS GUESS THAT THE READER WANTS TO HEAR. FYI The newspaper industry is in financial collapse…….simply because it is printed, or spun, does not mean it’s true. 1% of the people in the USA own 42% of it’s financial worth…….and whatever is printed and sold in a capitalist economy, is for one reason only, TO MAKE MONEY, to feed a debt spiral. So it really is no surprise that a magazine, with no regular readers since it was only launched in 2007, has an uphill struggle to maintain readership. So they invent stories……..and the media, operating like some soulless echo chamber, devoid of integrity or responsibility to TRUTH, repeats ANYTHING, as LONG AS IT BRINGS A FINANCIAL RETURN and does not get them into trouble. This woman has no power. The can say whatever they want to. Just like Mallory Lane, who was also used as a pawn in a big business power game.

  7. FORGET ABOUT iT
    May-26-2009 @ 12:31 pm

    Yes and all these sources and SO CALLED FRIENDS
    OF HERS are not but the words of the writer who
    wrote the story.. GET IT NOW>>What is going to
    happen now on the cover of In Touch Magazine and
    Star announcing that Brad and Jen are getting back together again.. Eh??? Or how about another
    ex the old singer or the one that she stole from Sandra Bullock Tate Donavon they would be another
    idea.. Instead of making sure to keep John front
    and centre.. NADA PLEASE

  8. Anonymous
    May-26-2009 @ 1:17 pm

    the ex that the tabs need to keep a watch on is Tate Donovan , according to usweekly two weeks ago they spoke to tate and an event ….. when they asked him about jen he had very nice things to say, he also mentioned that he was at her 40th birthday party and that they are close. Also he mentioned that at one time he thought he was ‘the one’ but that their breakup obviously ruled that out

    grazia mag also had the same story this week ,who knows maybe tate could be ‘the one again’ haha

  9. Anonymous
    May-26-2009 @ 1:28 pm

    jennifer aniston didnt steal tate from anyone ! lol. tate started dating jen a year afte his breakup with sandra , and jen was previously with adam duritz for 5 months before she dated dating tate in 1995 her first rolling stones interview had a mention of it

    While in Aspen, the friends meet each afternoon at Bonnie’s, a midmountain restaurant. They eat lunch, joke, discuss their lives. Just now, Aniston, who briefly dated Adam Duritz of Counting Crows earlier in 1995, is concerned about a new love interest. “I don’t know whether I’d call him a boyfriend,” she says. “Especially when it’s so new and I’m so scared and skeptical and have been on this solo thing. Isn’t that weird? I’m dating, and I like him very much. But when do I start to call him a boyfriend? Do you decide to go steady? You don’t anymore. Although Daniel, my old boyfriend, was funny. Three months into dating he said, ‘Will you be my girlfriend?’ Got down on his knees.”

    http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/5938503/the_girl_friend/2

    and this is her ex daniel who was before adam
    http://www.whosdatedwho.com/celebrities/people/dating/daniel-macdonald.htm

  10. anonymous
    May-26-2009 @ 4:30 pm

    This story sounds similar to the one the came out a month before they got back together last fall. If you’re going to make stuff up, then be original and dont re-write old tabloid stories. Neither one of them look like they are pining for the other. Leave them alone.

  11. anon1
    May-26-2009 @ 8:17 pm

    Fucking chill. Geez, he’s not creating the news only reporting it. Who believes this anyway?! If you want to be excessively naive, fine! They’re both douchey and cringe worthy anyway. He’s far more talented than she is, but if they marry, whateves! Whateves!!

  12. The Devil
    May-26-2009 @ 8:30 pm

    Using Aniston as a poster child for women that can not move on…is, well, pathetic.
    She can not move on from Brad, This dude, who else…

    Pathetic media constructions, poor woman.

  13. delicious darla
    May-26-2009 @ 11:25 pm

    Bitch please, this story is such crap.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared.

Want your image to show up? Get a gravatar, it's easy.